A Novel Large-scale Mentoring Program for Medical Students based on a Quantitative and Qualitative Needs Analysis.

A Novel Large-scale Mentoring Program for Medical Students based on a Quantitative and Qualitative Needs Analysis.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3205/zma000738
复制
发表时间:
2011-01-01
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Fischer, Martin R
Fischer, Martin R
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
von der Borch, Philip;Dimitriadis, Konstantinos;Fischer, Martin R

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:师徒对学生的学业表现和职业发展起着重要的作用。本研究的作者评估了医学生对指导的需求,并在路德维希-马克西米利安大学(LMU)慕尼黑医学院建立了一个新的大规模指导计划。方法:对所有医学院学生(4109名学生中578名,回复率14.1%)进行需求评估。此外,作者还与选定的医学生(n=24)和教员医师(n=22)进行了焦点小组讨论。所有报名参加个别辅导的学生都完成了一份关于他们期望的调查(n=534)。结果:需求评估显示,83%的医学生对LMU的教学总体满意。相比之下,只有36.5%的学生对教师如何支持他们的个人专业发展感到满意,86%的学生表示希望获得更多的个人和专业支持。当被要求定义导师的角色时,55.6%的人“非常”希望他们的导师充当顾问,为他们安排联系(36.4%),并为他们的专业发展提供建议(28.1%)。未来学员“非常”希望讨论的话题包括研究(56.6%)、最后一年的选修课(55.8%)和海外经历(45.5%)。结论:基于医学生对辅导的强烈愿望,作者开发了一种新的两层体系,在临床阶段为学生引入一对一的辅导,并为临床前学生提供基于社会的同伴辅导。项目启动一年后,300多名临床专业学生接受了一对一的辅导,1503名学生和医生参加了同侪辅导社团。
PURPOSE: Mentoring plays an important role in students' performance and career. The authors of this study assessed the need for mentoring among medical students and established a novel large-scale mentoring program at Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich School of Medicine.METHODS: Needs assessment was conducted using a survey distributed to all students at the medical school (n=578 of 4,109 students, return rate 14.1%). In addition, the authors held focus groups with selected medical students (n=24) and faculty physicians (n=22). All students signing up for the individual mentoring completed a survey addressing their expectations (n=534).RESULTS: Needs assessment revealed that 83% of medical students expressed overall satisfaction with the teaching at LMU. In contrast, only 36.5% were satisfied with how the faculty supports their individual professional development and 86% of students voiced a desire for more personal and professional support. When asked to define the role of a mentor, 55.6% "very much" wanted their mentors to act as counselors, arrange contacts for them (36.4%), and provide ideas for professional development (28.1%). Topics that future mentees "very much" wished to discuss included research (56.6%), final year electives (55.8%) and experiences abroad (45.5%).CONCLUSIONS: Based on the strong desire for mentoring among medical students, the authors developed a novel two-tiered system that introduces one-to-one mentoring for students in their clinical years and offers society-based peer mentoring for pre-clinical students. One year after launching the program, more than 300 clinical students had experienced one-to-one mentoring and 1,503 students and physicians were involved in peer mentoring societies.