METHOD OF RESIDUES IN URBAN MODELING

METHOD OF RESIDUES IN URBAN MODELING
复制标题

DOI:
10.1068/a080189
复制
发表时间:
1976-01-01
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
MARCH, L
MARCH, L
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
BATTY, M;MARCH, L

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文旨在通过将建模问题视为多阶段过程,将宏观静态方法扩展到城市建模。在这样一个过程中,早期阶段关注的是解释感兴趣的现象的相对琐碎的特征,而后期阶段则致力于解释更重要的行为问题。科尔曼(1964)称这种方法为“留数法”,它的威力首先在这里通过对著名的重力模型的重新解释得到证明。特设测试的方法在多伦多为中心的区域,以强调需要一个更正式的方法,从而引入的方法和贝叶斯观点之间的类比。信息最小化方法更通用,但与熵最大化方法一致且明确相关,用于使正式方法可操作,并且该方法用于生成空间交互模型的“扩展”家族。一些空间相互作用模型的推导,并得出结论,多伦多为中心的区域测试这些模型中的两个。
This paper seeks to extend the macrostatic approach to urban modelling by treating modelling problems as many-stage processes. Within such a process the early stages are concerned with explaining the relatively trivial characteristics of the phenomena of interest, and the later stages are devoted to explaining more important behavioural issues. Coleman (1964) calls this approach the ‘method of residues’, and its power is first demonstrated here by a reinterpretation of the well-known gravity model. An ad hoc test of the method on the Toronto-centred region serves to emphasise the need for a more formal approach, and thus an analogy between the method and the Bayesian viewpoint is introduced. A method of information minimising, more general but consistently and unambiguously related to the method of entropy maximising, is used to make the formal approach operational, and the method is used to generate an ‘extended’ family of spatial-interaction models. A number of spatial-interaction models are derived, and the paper is concluded by a test of two of these models on the Toronto-centred region.