Is the evaluation of the global quality of life determined by emotional status?
Is the evaluation of the global quality of life determined by emotional status?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1023/b:qure.0000040788.12947.b9
复制
发表时间：
2004-10-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Uutela, A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Heinonen, H;Aro, AR;Uutela, A
本研究探讨了全球生活质量感知与幸福感维度之间的关系。特别是我们的目标是评估普遍认可的生活质量的四个广泛维度（身体，功能，社会和情感健康）对全球生活质量感知的影响，此外，人们对生活成就和经济状况的满意度以及社会人口变量进行了测量。受试者是FINRISK-97研究中芬兰人的代表性样本（n = 4613，年龄从25岁到65岁）。相关系数和层次回归模型表明，生理、功能和社会幸福感以及社会人口因素和生活成就满意度是影响全球男性和女性生活质量感知的重要因素。然而，用这些测量方法解释的差异百分比只是中等高，范围从1%到10%。在将情绪幸福感的测量纳入层次回归分析模型后，解释的方差显著增加了20%以上。研究结果表明，整体生活质量的判断很可能是基于当前的情绪状态。
The present study investigated relationships between global QOL perceptions and well-being dimensions. Especially our goal was to evaluate the impact of generally recognised four broad dimensions of QOL ( physical, functional, social and emotional well-being) on global QOL perceptions, additionally person's satisfaction with life achievements and economical situation were measured as well as social demographic variables. The subjects were a representative sample of Finns (n = 4613, from 25 to 65 years) of the FINRISK-97 study. Correlation coefficients and models of hierarchical regression indicated that physical, functional and social well-being as well as sociodemographic factors and satisfaction with life achievements are important factors of global QOL perceptions both among males and females. However percentages of variances explained with these measures were only moderately high, ranging from 1 to 10%. After measures of emotional well-being were entered into the models of hierarchical analyses of regression, variances explained grew dramatically over 20%. The results of the study indicated that global QOL judgements are likely to be based on current emotional state.