The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
复制
发表时间：
2020-07-01
期刊：
影响因子：
9.8
通讯作者：
Dirnagl, Ulrich
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Moher, David;Bouter, Lex;Dirnagl, Ulrich
为了使知识有益于研究和社会，它必须是值得信赖的。值得信赖的研究在设计、执行和报告的各个阶段都是稳健、严格和透明的。对研究人员的评估仍然很少包括与可信度，严谨性和透明度相关的考虑。作为第六届世界科研诚信大会的一部分，我们制定了《香港原则》（HKP），特别关注通过确保研究人员因加强科研诚信的行为而得到明确认可和奖励，从而推动科研进步的需要。我们提出五项原则：负责任的研究实践;透明的报告;开放科学（开放研究）;重视研究类型的多样性;并认可对研究和学术活动的所有贡献。对于每一项原则，我们都提供了纳入的理由，并提供了这些原则已经被采用的例子。
For knowledge to benefit research and society, it must be trustworthy. Trustworthy research is robust, rigorous, and transparent at all stages of design, execution, and reporting. Assessment of researchers still rarely includes considerations related to trustworthiness, rigor, and transparency. We have developed the Hong Kong Principles (HKPs) as part of the 6th World Conference on Research Integrity with a specific focus on the need to drive research improvement through ensuring that researchers are explicitly recognized and rewarded for behaviors that strengthen research integrity. We present five principles: responsible research practices; transparent reporting; open science (open research); valuing a diversity of types of research; and recognizing all contributions to research and scholarly activity. For each principle, we provide a rationale for its inclusion and provide examples where these principles are already being adopted.