Assessing metamotivation in schizophrenia: A pilot study of the Brief Regulation of Motivation Scale (BRoMS).

Assessing metamotivation in schizophrenia: A pilot study of the Brief Regulation of Motivation Scale (BRoMS).
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114799
复制
发表时间:
2022-11
影响因子:
11.3
通讯作者:
Medalia, Alice
Medalia, Alice
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lynch, David A.;Brown, Marie;Saperstein, Alice;Stefancic, Ana;Medalia, Alice

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

元动机被定义为识别、监控和自我调节为实现目标服务的动机的能力。随着元动机成为精神障碍患者越来越感兴趣的干预领域,有必要制定有效和可靠的自我报告措施。目前的试点研究采用了简明动机调节量表(Broms),这是一种在大学生中得到验证的自我报告测量工具,用于精神分裂症谱系障碍患者,作为确定元动机测量的第一步。34名被诊断为精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍的参与者完成了适应的Broms测量和社区功能测量。经调查发现,Broms是可接受的、可行的和内部一致的。Broms分数越高,与工作相关的技能越好。在一个子样本(n=21)中进一步评估了同时效度和预测性效度,比较了Broms和参与者在半结构化访谈中的反应,以及自我激励和生活质量的测量。BROMS与访谈反应和动机相关分量表的同时效度有限;然而,对生活质量有适度的预测效度。这一试点数据表明,需要继续努力开发和验证元动员量表。
Metamotivation is defined as the ability to identify, monitor, and self-regulate motivation in service of goal attainment. As metamotivation is becoming an area of increased interest for intervention among people with psychiatric disorders, there is a need for valid and reliable self-report measures. The current pilot study adapted the Brief Regulation of Motivation Scale (BRoMS), a self-report measure validated among college students, for use with individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, as a first step towards identifying a metamotivation measure. Thirty-four participants diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder completed the adapted BRoMS measure and a measure of community functioning. The BRoMS was found to be acceptable, feasible and internally consistent. Higher BRoMs scores were associated with better work related skills. Concurrent and predictive validity were further evaluated among a subsample (n = 21), with comparisons between the BRoMS and participant responses on a semi-structured interview, and measures of self-motivation, and quality of life. The BRoMS demonstrated limited concurrent validity with the interview responses and motivation-related subscales; however, there was modest predictive validity regarding quality of life. This pilot data informs the need for continued efforts to develop and validate metamotivation scales.
DOI: 10.1177/0898264312440321
发表时间: 2012-09-01
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Stewart, Anita L.;Thrasher, Angela D.;Shea, Judy A.
通讯作者: Shea, Judy A.
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2012.699901
发表时间: 2013-01-01
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
Wolters, Christopher A.;Benzon, Maria B.
通讯作者: Benzon, Maria B.
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.06.003
发表时间: 2022-05
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Hansen, Marie C.;Lynch, David A.;Stefancic, Ana;Medalia, Alice
通讯作者: Medalia, Alice
DOI: 10.1093/swra/19.3.9
发表时间: 1983-01-01
期刊: SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH & ABSTRACTS
影响因子: --
作者:
SCHNEIDER, LC;STRUENING, EL
通讯作者: STRUENING, EL
DOI: 10.1007/s10879-021-09502-x
发表时间: 2021-04-15
影响因子: 2
作者:
Hansen, Marie C.;Gertmenian, Enid;Medalia, Alice
通讯作者: Medalia, Alice