Further Ado concerning Dasein's “Undifferentiated Mode”: Distinguishing the Indifferent Inauthenticity of Average Everyday Dasein from the Possibility of Genuine Failure
Further Ado concerning Dasein's “Undifferentiated Mode”: Distinguishing the Indifferent Inauthenticity of Average Everyday Dasein from the Possibility of Genuine Failure
复制标题
关于此在的“无差别模式”的进一步废话：区分普通日常此在的冷漠不真实性与真正失败的可能性
DOI：
10.1080/00071773.2015.1021204
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
Oren Magid
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Oren Magid
在这篇文章中，我反对在存在与时间中定位一种“无差异模式”的解释观点，即此在既非真实也非非真实的模式。海德格尔似乎声称此在可以以一种“无差别的模式”存在，他更好地被理解为讨论一种我称之为冷漠的真实性的现象。平均每天的“无差别”通常被认为是一种“无差别模式”，也就是说，更好地理解为未能区分真实的和不真实的自我理解的可能性。Dasein的日常平均自我理解对这种区别无动于衷，我证明了这正是使其不真实的原因。然而，认识到这一区别并不足以使此生成为真实的存在。相反，它开启了一种非冷漠、冷漠的真实性的可能性，以及海德格尔所说的“真正失败的可能性”。把一种“无差别模式”解读为“存在与时间”，就是误解了它的方法论进程，从此在的日常的、不真实的自我理解到它的真实性--“事物本身”。一些精选的段落乍一看似乎表明并非如此。然而，存在和时间--就像一般的存在和此在本身一样--不能被正确地理解为“没有更多的麻烦”。
In this paper, I argue against the interpretive view that locates an “undifferentiated mode” – a mode in which Dasein is neither authentic nor inauthentic – in Being and Time. Where Heidegger seems to be claiming that Dasein can exist in an “undifferentiated mode”, he is better understood as discussing a phenomenon I call indifferent inauthenticity. The average everyday “Indifferenz” which is often taken as an indication of an “undifferentiated mode”, that is, is better understood as a failure to distinguish between the possibilities of authentic and inauthentic self-understanding. Dasein's average everyday self-understanding is indifferent to this distinction, and I show that this is precisely what renders it inauthentic. Recognizing this distinction, however, is not enough to render Dasein authentic. Rather, it opens up the possibility of a non-indifferent inauthenticity and what Heidegger calls the possibility of “genuine failure”. To read an “undifferentiated mode” into Being and Time is to misunderstand its methodological progression from Dasein's average everyday, inauthentic self-understanding to its authenticity – “to the thing itself”. A select few passages may at first seem to indicate otherwise. However, Being and Time – like both being in general and Dasein itself – cannot be properly understood “without further ado”.