Putting it in context: the use of vignettes in qualitative interviewing
Putting it in context: the use of vignettes in qualitative interviewing
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1468794109356737
复制
发表时间：
2010-04-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Neale, Joanne
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jenkins, Nicholas;Bloor, Michael;Neale, Joanne
这篇文章借鉴了两项独立的研究，采用发展小插曲（通过一系列阶段展开的假设场景）来采访研究参与者。一项研究使用了“戴维”的小插曲，这是一种传统的固定叙事，而在第二项研究中，“杰克和珍妮”的小插曲通过超链接一系列ppt场景，并根据受访者对前一张幻灯片的反应来选择下一张幻灯片，从而实现了互动。我们对这两个片段的分析立场，是舒兹现象学的分析立场。我们指出，在考虑小插曲情景和行动情况时，参与者在解释过程中所经历的主题和动机相关性存在差异。然而，我们表明，研究参与者对小片段的反应可以产生他们自己感兴趣的数据，因为参与者在考虑刺激时表现出“你取向”和“他们取向”。最后，我们对固定的“戴维”和互动的“杰克和珍妮”小插曲进行了比较评估。
The article draws on two separate studies employing developmental vignettes (hypothetical scenarios which unfold through a series of stages) to interview research participants. One study used the 'Davie' vignette, which was a conventional fixed narrative, while in the second, the 'Jack and Jenny' vignettes were made interactive by hyperlinking a series of PowerPoint scenarios and making the choice of the succeeding slide dependent on the interviewee's reaction to its predecessor. Our analytic standpoint, in respect of both vignettes, is that of Schutzian phenomenology. We point to differences in both topical and motivational relevances in the processes of interpretation undergone by participants in considering the vignette scenario and in the situation of action. However, we show that research participants' responses to vignettes can yield data of interest in their own right as participants perform 'Thou-orientations' and 'They-orientations' in their consideration of the stimuli. We close with a comparative evaluation of the fixed 'Davie' and the interactive 'Jack and Jenny' vignettes.