Criteria for item selection for a preference-based measure for use in economic evaluation.
Criteria for item selection for a preference-based measure for use in economic evaluation.
复制标题
基于偏好的措施的项目选择标准用于经济评估。
DOI：
10.1007/s11136-020-02718-9
复制
发表时间：
2021-05
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Brazier J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Peasgood T;Mukuria C;Carlton J;Connell J;Brazier J
基于偏好的测量方法允许患者报告他们的健康水平，然后使用具有代表性的普通人群样本中的偏好权重对响应进行评分，以用于成本效用分析。新的基于偏好的措施的制定过程应确保选择有效的项目，以反映该措施所包含的感兴趣的概念，并且这些项目适合用于激发偏好的工作。审查了关于患者报告的结果测量(PROMS)发展的现有标准，并考虑了其他因素，以便产生支持新的基于偏好的测量的发展的标准。提出了22个不同方面的标准，涉及基于偏好的措施的项目选择。这些标准包括如何表述项目以确保准确完成、项目在领域范围方面的复盖面以及对当前成果的关注以及项目是否适合进行估值。这些标准旨在通过讨论支持制定新的基于偏好的措施，以确保即使在标准之间存在冲突的情况下，也在项目选择阶段审议了问题。这将通过统一既定标准和扩大清单以反映基于优惠的措施的独特特点，最大限度地减少估值阶段的问题。
Preference-based measures allow patients to report their level of health, and the responses are then scored using preference weights from a representative general population sample for use in cost utility analysis. The development process of new preference-based measures should ensure that valid items are selected to reflect the constructs of interest included in the measure and that are suitable for use in preference-elicitation exercises. Existing criteria on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) development were reviewed, and additional considerations were taken into account in order to generate criteria to support development of new preference-based measures. Criteria covering 22 different aspects related to item selection for preference-based measures are presented. These include criteria related to how items are phrased to ensure accurate completion, the coverage of items in terms of range of domains as well as focus on current outcomes and whether items are suitable for valuation. The criteria are aimed at supporting the development of new preference-based measures with discussion to ensure that even where there is conflict between criteria, issues have been considered at the item selection stage. This would minimize problems at valuation stage by harmonizing established criteria and expanding lists to reflect the unique characteristics of preference-based measures.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Brazier, J. E.;Rowen, D.;Ibbotson, R.
通讯作者：
Ibbotson, R.
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Brazier AJ;Avril M;Bernabeu M;Benjamin M;Smith JD
通讯作者：
Smith JD
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Teresi, Jeanne A.;Fleishman, John A.
通讯作者：
Fleishman, John A.
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Gelin, MN;Zumbo, BD
通讯作者：
Zumbo, BD
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Richardson, Jeff;Iezzi, Angelo;Maxwell, Aimee
通讯作者：
Maxwell, Aimee