Environmental satisfiers in academe

Environmental satisfiers in academe
复制标题

学术界环境满意者

DOI:
10.1007/bf00140270
复制
发表时间:
1983
期刊:
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Robert E. Seiler
Robert E. Seiler
中科院分区:
教育学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. A. Pearson;Robert E. Seiler

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

利用美国全国范围内的大学教授样本,本研究探讨了院士的工作满意度水平以及专业学校教师与其他学科教师感知满意度之间的差异。调查结果是基于来自24所大学的336名教师的反馈,这些大学是分层选出的,包括大型、小型、公立和私立大学。教学维度和研究要求是最令人满意的学术工作环境要素;支持和补偿方面是最不满意的。来自专业学院的教师对22个独立的环境维度的满意度几乎都更高,这些教师的工资也更高,对终身教职和晋升的要求也不那么严格。能够解释工作满意度得分差异最大的人口统计学变量是任期、教学负荷、性别、机构(公私合营)和年龄。工资和学术等级,这两个先验的因素被认为是对院士工作满意度的重要影响,似乎对院士工作满意度的影响较小。
Utilizing a nationwide sample of university professors in the United States, this study explored job satisfaction levels of academicians and the differences between perceived satisfaction of faculty in professional schools and that of faculty in other disciplines. The results were based upon responses from 336 faculty representing 24 universities selected on a stratified basis which included large, small, public and private universities.Teaching dimensions and research requirements were the most satisfying elements of the academic work environment; support and compensation aspects were the most dissatisfying. Faculty from professional schools reported higher levels of satisfaction for almost all of the 22 separate environmental dimensions, and these faculty also reported higher salaries and less stringent requirements for tenure and promotion.The demographic variables which explained the greatest amount of variance in work satisfaction scores were tenure, teaching load, sex, institution (public-private), and age. Salary and academic rank, which a priori are considered to be significant in an academician's satisfaction with work, appeared to have a lesser impact.