‘A pathetic and racist and awful character’: ethnomethodological approaches to the reception of diasporic fiction

‘A pathetic and racist and awful character’: ethnomethodological approaches to the reception of diasporic fiction
复制标题

“一个可悲的、种族主义的、可怕的角色”:接受散居小说的民族方法论

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Bethan Benwell
Bethan Benwell
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bethan Benwell

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在这篇文章中,我报告了一个正在进行的研究项目的结果,该项目涉及一系列跨国图书团体阅读同一系列“散居”小说的活动。本研究并不依赖于读者对文本暗示的反应,而是将阅读视为一种社会性的、本地化的活动,取决于它产生的语境。文学接受的经验方法(无论是历史的,实验的,还是民族志的)很少充分考虑接受数据产生的条件。一个民族方法学分析转录的图书小组会议阐明了“社会秩序”的特定图书群体,他们的隐含价值观和问责制度,以及他们的精心管理和谈判的主观经验。这有助于对文学阐释过程的复杂理解,使阅读的语言学研究成为社会学接受研究的补充。
In this article I report on findings from an ongoing research project into the activities of a transnational range of book groups reading the same series of ‘diasporic’ novels. Rather than relying upon speculations as to how readers respond to text-immanent cues, this project conceives reading as a socially situated, localized activity, contingent upon the context in which it is produced. Empirical approaches to literary reception (whether historical, experimental, or ethnographic) have rarely taken full account of the conditions in which reception data is produced. An ethnomethodological analysis of transcribed book group sessions illuminates the ‘social order’ of particular book groups, their implicit values and systems of accountability, and their careful management and negotiation of subjective experience. This contributes to a complex understanding of the processes of literary interpretation, allowing linguistic studies of reading to complement sociological reception studies.
阅读群体和文学文本的语言:社会阅读的案例研究
DOI: 10.1177/0963947009105852
发表时间: 2009
期刊: International Journal of Stylistics
影响因子: --
作者:
Swann J
通讯作者: Swann J