About time: a comparison of computerized and manual procedures for grammatical and phonological analysis
About time: a comparison of computerized and manual procedures for grammatical and phonological analysis
复制标题
关于时间：语法和语音分析的计算机化和手动程序的比较
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Long
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Long
对语音和语法分析过程的时间效率进行了研究，比较了手工方法和计算机方法。参与者是256名学生和执业临床医生，他们接受了大学层面的分析程序指导。音系学分析包括对可变性、同音异义词、词形、语音清单、产生的准确性以及目标和产生形式之间的对应关系的评估。语法分析包括MLU和描述性统计、句法类型数量、LARSP、DSS和IPSyn。三个语音样本和三个语法样本被分析，它们的大小和复杂程度/严重程度不同。无一例外，电脑化分析完成得更快，准确度与人工分析相当或更高。计算机化和人工方法所需的时间都受到分析类型、样本类型和单个参与者的效率的影响。然而，总体结果支持这样一种观点，即即使在繁忙的临床时间表上，如果通过计算机进行非标准化评估也是可行的。
The time efficiency of procedures for phonological and grammatical analysis was studied, comparing manual and computerised methods. Participants were 256 students and practising clinicians who had received university-level instruction in the analysis procedures they performed. Phonological analyses included the evaluation of variability, homonymy, word shapes, phonetic inventory, accuracy of production and correspondence between target and production forms. Grammatical analyses included MLU and descriptive statistics, number of syntactic types, LARSP, DSS, and IPSyn. Three phonological samples and three grammatical samples, varying in size and complexity/severity, were analysed. Without exception, computerised analyses were completed faster and with equal or better accuracy than manual analyses. The time needed for both computerised and manual methods was affected by the type of analysis, the type of sample, and the efficiency of individual participants. Nevertheless, the overall findings support the view that non-standardized assessment is feasible even in a busy clinical timetable, if it is done by computer.
儿童语言样本的自动语法标记。
DOI：
10.1044/jslhr.4203.727
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
影响因子：
--
作者：
Channell,RW;Johnson,BW
通讯作者：
Johnson,BW