On the Generalized Springer Correspondence for Exceptional Groups
On the Generalized Springer Correspondence for Exceptional Groups
复制标题
关于特殊群体的广义施普林格对应
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1985
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
N. Spaltenstein
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
N. Spaltenstein
Let G be a connected reductive algebraic group defined over an algebraically closed field k. Let Q3G be the variety of Borel subgroups of G, and for x e G let Q3~={B e Q3GIB;) x}. Springer [28] has shown that the Weyl group W of G acts naturally on the .e-adic cohomology groups Hi(Q3~; Qi) (.e a prime, .e*char(k». We shall consider here the action of W defined by Lusztig [13] rather than that defined originally by Springer (they agree up to tensoring by the sign representation of W [10]; moreover no restriction on the characteristic is needed in [13]). If H is a finite group, let H" be the set of all isomorphism classes of irreducible Qrrepresentations of H. For x e G the finite group AG(x)= CaCx)/C~(x) acts on H*(Q3~) (we shall omit the Qt), and this action commutes with that of W. Let d",=dimQ3~. The action of WXAG(x) in H2dz()8~) turns out to be particularly interesting. For any peW" there exist a unipotent element u e G and ¢ e AG(u)" such that p®¢ occurs in H2d"()8~). Moreover the pair (u, ¢) is unique up to G-conjugation, and p®¢ occurs with multiplicity one in H2d"()8~). We write then p=p~,~. This injective map from W" to the set JIf G of conjugacy classes of pairs (u, ¢) (u e G unipotent, ¢ e AG(u)") is explicitly known in most cases. If the characteristic is good, it is described by Shoji [22] [23] (G classical, F4), Springer [28] (Gz), Alvis, Lusztig and the author [3] (En. n=6, 7, 8). Classical groups in characteristic 2 are treated in [17]. We shall consider here exceptional groups in bad characteristic. We shall also be concerned with Lusztig's generalization of Springer's correspondence [14]. Consider a pair (u, ¢) (u e G unipotent, ¢ e AG(U)A). Lusztig attaches to (u, ¢) a 4-tuple (L, v, t, p) (or rather a G-conjugacy class of such objects), where L is a Levi factor of some parabolic subgroup of G, veL is unipotent, t e Aiv)", p e (NG(L)/L)". If L=G, then (v, t) is conjugate to (u, ¢) and p is automatically trivial, and we say that (u, ¢) is cuspidal for G. Lusztig's construction has in particular the following properties. It defines a bijection between JIf G and the set fll' G of G-conjugacy classes of 4-tuples (L, v, t, p) as above for which (v, t) is cuspidal