Child-Labor Legislation and the Labor Force Participation of Children
Child-Labor Legislation and the Labor Force Participation of Children
复制标题
童工立法和儿童劳动力参与
DOI:
10.1017/s002205070011174x
复制
发表时间:
1974
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Allen R. Sanderson
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Allen R. Sanderson
This study is an attempt to examine the impact of child-labor legislation in the United States during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries on the participation rates of children in the market and on the distribution of employed children among various occupational categories. While children have been employed from the beginning of the nation, mainly in agriculture and domestic service, legislation regulating certain aspects of that employment did not appear to any extent until the post-Civil War period. The bulk of state legislation came between 1880 and 1910. Federal statutes did not appear until the 1910-20 decade. The traditional interpretation, although it is possible to find some opinion to the contrary, suggests that the pre-1900 state laws were rather ineffective in curbing the widespread employment of children. By 1900 18.2 percent of all children ten through fifteen in the population were gainfully employed, compared with 16.8 percent in 1880. Legislation in this period, passed with relatively little publicity, was beset with poor enforcement, limited occupational coverage, and restrictions on only the younger ages of the census definition of children. A humanitarian move-ment, led by Felix Adler, Florence Kelly, Jane Addams, and aided by church groups, women's clubs, and civic organizations, is credited with correcting deficiencies in existing statutes and pressing for additional legislation at the turn of the century. The avowed goal of the reform groups was to reverse the supposed increasing trend in the industrial employment of children. It was also the contention of these organizations that the situation had worsened during the 1900-10 decade and now only federal legislation could stem the flow of children into the factories. The advocates of more stringent legislation used the issue of child labor to illustrate their contempt for the factory and market system in general. The legislation either prohibited the employment of children below a certain age, enumerated restricted occupations, set ceilings and timing for hours of work, or specified educational requirements for employment. The paper treats mainly the age provisions, usually a minimum age of for legal employment, the uniformity issue