'Surplus Profits' and Progressive Land Ownership: A Marxist Perspective
'Surplus Profits' and Progressive Land Ownership: A Marxist Perspective
复制标题
“剩余利润”和进步的土地所有制：马克思主义的视角
DOI：
10.1080/03017605.2016.1199630
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
0.3
通讯作者：
Potts N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Potts N
首先，我概述了山·特恩布尔关于商人从他们的投资(如购物中心)中赚取“剩余利润”的想法，以及使用累进形式的土地所有权如何可能消除或夺取这些“剩余利润”，从而使当地社区受益。接下来，我解释马克思关于在我们的资本主义经济中如何生产和分配利润的观点。这让我们看到，特恩布尔的“盈余利润”在道德上并不比资本主义下的总体利润更好或更差。然后，我将重点放在马克思如何想象固定资本的价值是如何确定的，以及它如何能够(关键是不能)以货币形式回到资本家手中，货币是一种非固定的价值形式。最后，我回到另一种进步形式的土地所有权对地方社区的潜在有用性的问题，现在是在马克思关于如何在我们的资本主义社会中生产和分配价值和利润的框架指导下的。
Firstly I outline Shan Turnbull’s idea of businessmen earning ‘surplus profits’ on their investments, like a shopping centre, and how potentially the use of progressive forms of land ownership may eliminate, or capture, these ‘surplus profits’ to the advantage of the local community. Next I explain Marx’s view of how profit is produced and distributed in our capitalist economy. This allows us to see how Turnbull’s ‘surplus profits’ are no better or worse ethically than profit in general under capitalism. I then focus on how Marx imagines the value of fixed capital is determined and how it can, or crucially cannot, return to the capitalist in money, a non-fixed form of value. Finally I return to the question of the potential usefulness of alternative progressive forms of land ownership to local communities, now guided by Marx’s framework of how value and profit are produced and distributed in our capitalist society.