Comparing real-world advantages for the clinical neuroradiologist between a high field (3 T), a phased array (1.5 T) vs. a single-channel 1.5-T MR system
Comparing real-world advantages for the clinical neuroradiologist between a high field (3 T), a phased array (1.5 T) vs. a single-channel 1.5-T MR system
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/jmri.20612
复制
发表时间:
2006-07-01
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Knopp, Edmond A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Orbach, Darren B.;Wu, Chris;Knopp, Edmond A.
Purpose: To evaluate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and neuroradioligists' subjective assessments of image quality in 3-Telsa (3-T) or phased MR systems that are now available for clinical neuroimaging.Materials and Methods: Brain MR images of six normal volunteers were obtained on each of three scanners: a 1.5-T single-channel system, a 12-channel, phased away system, and a 3-T single-channel system. Additionally, clinically optimized images acquired from 28 patients who underwent imaging in more than one of these systems were analyzed. SNRs were measured and image quality and artifact conspicuity were graded by two blinded readers.Results: The phased-array system produced higher SNR than either the 1.5-T or the 3-T single channel systems, and in no instance was it outperformed. Both blinded readers judged the phased-array images to be of higher quality than those produced by the single-channel systems, with significantly less artifact. The 3-T magnet produced images with higher SNR, but with increased artifact conspicuity. The phased-array system markedly decreased acquisition times without introduction of artifacts.Conclusion: Both quantitatively and qualitatively the phased-array system provided image quality superior to that of the 1.5-T and 3-T single channel systems.