The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies.
The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1212/wnl.0000000000002774
复制
发表时间：
2016-06-14
期刊：
影响因子：
9.9
通讯作者：
IMSVISUAL consortium
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cruz-Herranz A;Balk LJ;Oberwahrenbrock T;Saidha S;Martinez-Lapiscina EH;Lagreze WA;Schuman JS;Villoslada P;Calabresi P;Balcer L;Petzold A;Green AJ;Paul F;Brandt AU;Albrecht P;IMSVISUAL consortium
制定定量光学相干断层扫描（OCT）研究结果报告的共识建议。一组经验丰富的OCT研究人员（包括11名神经科医生、2名眼科医生和2名神经科学家）讨论了执行和报告视网膜形态学定量分析的要求，并根据经验和先前的研究制定了一份初步建议清单。后来在协调小组的几次会议上订正了建议清单。我们提供了一个9点清单，其中包括报告定量OCT研究时认为相关的方面。涵盖的领域包括研究方案、采集设备、采集设置、扫描方案、眼底成像、采集后数据选择、采集后数据分析、推荐命名法和统计分析。OCT研究术语和要素建议方案包括核心项目，以规范和提高定量OCT研究报告的质量。这些建议将使定量OCT研究报告更加一致，并与其他生物医学领域报告研究的现有标准保持一致。这些建议来自专家共识，因此代表了IV类证据。它们需要根据新的见解和实践进行定期调整。
To develop consensus recommendations for reporting of quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) study results. A panel of experienced OCT researchers (including 11 neurologists, 2 ophthalmologists, and 2 neuroscientists) discussed requirements for performing and reporting quantitative analyses of retinal morphology and developed a list of initial recommendations based on experience and previous studies. The list of recommendations was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group. We provide a 9-point checklist encompassing aspects deemed relevant when reporting quantitative OCT studies. The areas covered are study protocol, acquisition device, acquisition settings, scanning protocol, funduscopic imaging, postacquisition data selection, postacquisition data analysis, recommended nomenclature, and statistical analysis. The Advised Protocol for OCT Study Terminology and Elements recommendations include core items to standardize and improve quality of reporting in quantitative OCT studies. The recommendations will make reporting of quantitative OCT studies more consistent and in line with existing standards for reporting research in other biomedical areas. The recommendations originated from expert consensus and thus represent Class IV evidence. They will need to be regularly adjusted according to new insights and practices.