Do consumers prefer local animal products produced with local feed? Results from a Discrete-Choice experiment
Do consumers prefer local animal products produced with local feed? Results from a Discrete-Choice experiment
复制标题
消费者是否更喜欢用当地饲料生产的当地动物产品?
DOI:
10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.07.007
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
5.3
通讯作者:
U. Hamm
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Adriano Profeta;U. Hamm
Many studies have revealed a high consumer preference and willingness-to-pay for local food (Feldmann and Hamm, 2015). Nonetheless, there is very little research on whether consumers accept the use of imported feed for animal products labelled as ‘local’. Europe is heavily dependent on protein-rich feed from South America and the US (Watson et al., 2017) and this dependency holds particularly for the animal production hot spots in the Netherlands and North-Western Germany (Van Grinsven, Spiertz, Westhoek, Bouwman, & Erisman, 2014), and the organic sector.Soybean cultivation in Brazil and Argentina is linked to deforestation, savannah removal, and land grabbing (Boerema et al., 2016, Smaling et al., 2008). Most German consumers do not know that locally produced animal products in Germany are often produced with imported feed and that these imports are associated with negative environmental or social effects (Uhl and Schnell, 2014, Wägeli et al., 2016). In the EU, research and cultivation of domestic protein plants have been increasingly promoted. The German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) has started a protein strategy to reduce the proportion of imported soya (BMEL, 2016). Nonetheless, producing animal products with local feed in Europe is usually more expensive than using imported protein feed due to comparative disadvantages in production costs (Kaltenecker, Kemper, Schaack, & von Schenk, 2017). Therefore, local production chains are only economically feasible for a farmer if either public subsidies are paid to the farmers, or higher prices for animal products produced with local feed can be achieved in the market.