Does Modified Interpretation Bias Influence Automatic Avoidance Behaviour?
Does Modified Interpretation Bias Influence Automatic Avoidance Behaviour?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/acp.1679
复制
发表时间：
2010-04-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Rinck, Mike
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lange, Wolf-Gero;Salemink, Elske;Rinck, Mike
认知偏差修正（CBM）研究表明，解释偏差在社交焦虑障碍的病因学和维持中起着因果作用。然而，它是未知的，如果诱导偏见的影响转移到行为。在两项模拟研究中，在“平均焦虑”的参与者中诱导积极和消极的解释偏见后，测量了对厌恶和积极刺激的行为变化。情绪多面显示（“人群”）的反应进行了测量，使用间接的接近回避任务（AAT）。人群中有不同比例的中性和愤怒的面孔，也有不同比例的高兴和愤怒的面孔。在实验1中，当人群中愤怒图片的数量增加时，负向训练的参与者（NET）对中性愤怒人群表现出更快的回避反应。这种反应模式类似于以前在社交焦虑个体中发现的反应模式。实验2复制的认知偏差操纵概念上可比的材料的效果，但没有表现出转移到行为任务。这些研究增加了关于成功修改解释性偏见和概括性的行为任务的知识体系。版权所有（C）2010约翰威利父子有限公司
Cognitive bias modification (CBM) studies suggest a causal role of interpretation biases in the aetiology and maintenance of Social Anxiety Disorder. However, it is unknown if the effects of induced biases transfer to behaviour. In two analogue studies, behavioural changes in response to aversive and positive stimuli were measured after the induction of positive and negative interpretation biases in 'averagely anxious' participants. Responses to emotional multi-facial displays ('crowds') were measured using an indirect Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT). The crowds comprised different ratios of either neutral and angry faces or happy and angry faces. In Experiment 1, negatively trained participants (NETs) showed a faster avoidance response for the neutral-angry crowds when the number of angry pictures in the crowd increased. This response pattern resembles the one previously found in socially anxious individuals. Experiment 2 replicated the effect of the cognitive bias manipulation on conceptually comparable material, but did not show transfer to the behavioural task. These studies add to the body of knowledge regarding successful modification of interpretive bias and generalizability to a behavioural task. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.