THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE MAD - RESPONSE BIAS IN SELF-REPORT MEASURES
THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE MAD - RESPONSE BIAS IN SELF-REPORT MEASURES
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/0191-8869(82)90051-4
复制
发表时间：
1982-01-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
HENDERSON, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
FURNHAM, A;HENDERSON, M
本研究旨在研究5种广泛使用的自我报告措施对反应集偏倚的敏感性。受试者（人类）被要求要么假装好，（给人一个好印象），要么假装坏，（给人一个坏印象），要么假装生气，（给人一个精神不稳定的印象）或诚实地回答。假装好的被试者有更高的外向性、谎言和社会期望分数，但最低的神经质、精神质和社交焦虑分数。假装坏的受试者的外向性明显较低，精神病性和社交焦虑得分较高。假装疯狂的被试在自我监控和控制点上得分更高。8个量表中有4个在假装坏和假装疯的被试之间有显著差异。最后，本文从问卷设计和被试动机两个方面对研究结果进行了讨论。
This study set out to examine the susceptibility of 5 extensively used, self-report measures to response set bias. Subjects (human) were requested either to fake good, (give a good impression), fake bad, (give a bad impression), fake mad, (give an impression of mental instability) or respond honestly. Subjects who faked good had significantly higher extraversion, lie and social desirability scores but lowest neuroticism, psychoticism and social anxiety scores. Subjects who faked bad had significantly lower extraversion and higher psychoticism and social anxiety scores. Fake mad subjects scored higher on self-monitoring and locus of control. Four of the 8 scales showed significant differences between subjects faking bad and those faking mad. The results are discussed in terms of questionnaire design and respondent''s motivation.