Causality and the allocation of attention during comprehension.

Causality and the allocation of attention during comprehension.
复制标题

理解过程中的因果关系和注意力分配。

DOI:
10.1037//0278-7393.16.2.233
复制
发表时间:
1990
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Marsolek,CJ
Marsolek,CJ
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fletcher,CR;Hummel,JE;Marsolek,CJ

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

最近的研究表明,叙事文本中的每一个陈述都是通过将其与因果前因和后果联系起来来理解的,而整个文本是通过找到将其开头与最终结果联系起来的因果路径来理解的。弗莱彻和布鲁姆(Bloom,1988)提出,为了实现这一目标,在尽量减少搜索长期记忆的次数的同时,读者将注意力集中在一篇叙述文章的最后一句,这篇文章在前面的文本中有因果关系的先行词,但没有后果。因此,一个陈述后面跟着一个因果先行词应该仍然是注意的焦点,而同样的陈述后面跟着一个结果不应该。这一预测在三个实验中得到了验证和证实,这些实验表明,当一个目标陈述后面跟着一个只包括因果先行词的句子时,(a)与之相关的延续句子读得更快,(B)从中提取的目标词更容易识别,(c)受试者生成的延续更有可能与之因果相关。
Recent research has suggested that each statement in a narrative text is understood by relating it to its causal antecedents and consequences and that the text as a whole is understood by finding a causal path linking its opening to its final outcome. Fletcher and Bloom (1988) have proposed that in order to accomplish this goal, while minimizing the number of times long-term memory has to be searched, readers focus their attention on the last clause of a narrative that has causal antecedents but no consequences in the preceding text. As a result, a statement that is followed by a causal antecedent should remain the focus of attention, while the same statement followed by a consequence should not. This prediction was tested and confirmed in three experiments which show that when a target statement is followed by a sentence that includes only causal antecedents,(a) continuation sentences related to it are read more quickly,(b) target words drawn from it are easier to recognize, and (c) subject-generated continuations are more likely to be causally related to it.
DOI: 10.1016/0749-596x(85)90049-x
发表时间: 1985-10
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
T. Trabasso;P. Broek
通讯作者: T. Trabasso;P. Broek
文本的学习和理解
DOI: --
发表时间: 1988
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Elizabeth B. Bernhardt;H. Mandl;N. Stein;T. Trabasso
通讯作者: T. Trabasso
DOI: 10.2307/1422093
发表时间: 1972
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
J. Carroll;R. Freedle
通讯作者: R. Freedle
DOI: 10.1016/0749-596x(87)90101-x
发表时间: 1987-08
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
J. L. Myers;Makiko Shinjo;S. Duffy
通讯作者: J. L. Myers;Makiko Shinjo;S. Duffy
故事事件的因果关系和重要性
DOI: 10.1016/0749-596x(85)90048-8
发表时间: 1985
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
T. Trabasso;L. Sperry
通讯作者: L. Sperry