Partnerships for Parks and Physical Activity
Partnerships for Parks and Physical Activity
复制标题
DOI：
10.4278/ajhp.130430-arb-215
复制
发表时间：
2014-01-01
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Bhatia, Rajiv
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shulaker, Bianca D.;Isacoff, Jennifer W.;Bhatia, Rajiv
目的。鉴于对综合和多学科的积极生活干预的需要，本文描述了公园设计和评估的创新伙伴关系。公共土地信托基金与兰德公司和旧金山公共卫生部合作，生成与上下文相关的活动公园设计，建立评估方法，并为未来的合作建立框架。这些合作伙伴从2009年到2012年在加州旧金山合作设计、翻新和学习公园。这三个合作组织是本文的重点。干预。公共土地信托基金的人民公园湾区计划筹集了1600多万美元，用于翻新旧金山的三个公园，这是一项最初将三个合作组织聚集在一起的研究的干预措施。代表三个合作伙伴的作者合作制定了经验教训。分析。这篇文章是对强调社区参与和严格评估的伙伴关系的描述和评论。吸取的经验教训和成功伙伴关系的要素包括与具有不同专业知识的组织合作、初步确定目标、找到共同语言、让当地社区参与以及认识到评价的重要性和适当作用。提出的协作和社区参与模式支持和鼓励其他组织利用战略性、多学科伙伴关系，并强调评价的重要性。
Purpose. Given the need for comprehensive and multidisciplinary active living interventions, this article describes an innovative partnership for park design and evaluation.Design. The Trust for Public Land partnered with the RAND Corporation and the San Francisco Department of Public Health to generate context-sensitive active park design, establish evaluation methods, and build the framework for future collaboration.Setting. These partners worked together from 2009 to 2012 to design, renovate, and study parks in San Francisco, California.Subjects. The three partnering organizations are the focus of this article.Intervention. The Trust for Public Land's Parks for People-Bay Area Program raised more than $16 million to renovate three San Francisco parks, which served as the intervention for a study that initially brought the three partnering organizations together.Measures. The authors, who represent the three partners, collaborated to develop the lessons learned.Analysis. This article is a description and commentary about a partnership that emphasized community involvement and rigorous evaluation.Results. Lessons learned and elements for successful partnerships include collaborating with organizations with differing expertise, deciding upon goals initially, finding a common language, involving local communities, and recognizing the importance and appropriate role of evaluations.Conclusion. The model for collaboration and community involvement presented supports and encourages other organizations to use strategic, multidisciplinary partnerships and highlights the importance of evaluation.