Theoretical to Tangible: Creating a Measure of Self-Advocacy for Female Cancer Survivors.
Theoretical to Tangible: Creating a Measure of Self-Advocacy for Female Cancer Survivors.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1891/1061-3749.24.3.428
复制
发表时间：
2016-12-01
影响因子：
0.7
通讯作者：
Donovan H
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hagan TL;Cohen S;Stone C;Donovan H
在肿瘤学中，自我宣传是一个很受欢迎但定义不清的概念。发展的女性自我倡导癌症生存（FSACS）量表的理论基础和项目开发导致的措施的内容效度和信度的评价。自我辩护结构包括3个亚维度，共57个Likert型自陈项目。内容效度结果（S-CVI = 0.81和S-CVI/UA = 0.83）显示条目间有较强的相关性。3个子维度的信度结果均支持FSACS量表评分的一致性，具有较强的内部一致性（Cronbach α = .88，.81和.90）和重测信度（PPMC r = .85，.97和.88）。FSACS量表捕捉自我辩护的结构，其分数显示出很强的可靠性。
Self-advocacy is well appreciated but poorly defined concept in oncology. The development of the Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship (FSACS) Scale’s theoretical underpinnings and item development led to evaluations of the measure’s content validity and reliability. The construct of self-advocacy contains 3 subdimensions with 57 Likert-type self-report items. Content validity results (S-CVI = 0.81 and S-CVI/UA = 0.83) indicated strong relevancy of items. Reliability results for each of the 3 subdimensions supported the consistency of the FSACS Scale scores, with strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s alphas = .88, .81, and .90) and test–retest reliability (PPMC r = .85, .97, and .88). The FSACS Scale captures the construct of self-advocacy, and its scores show strong reliability.