OVERHEAD DEEP SQUAT PERFORMANCE PREDICTS FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ SCORE.
OVERHEAD DEEP SQUAT PERFORMANCE PREDICTS FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ SCORE.
复制标题
过头深蹲表现可预测功能运动 SCREEN™ 得分。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
J. Oñate
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Clifton;Dustin R. Grooms;J. Oñate
背景
建议使用功能运动筛查 (FMS™) 来预测活跃人群的伤害风险，但时间限制可能会限制筛查测试电池的使用。确定 FMS™ 的一个组件可以预测哪些人在整个测试中表现不佳，因此应该接受整组筛查操作，可以减少时间限制并提高参与前筛查的利用率。
目的
本研究的目的是确定 FMS™ 过头深蹲测试 (DS) 的表现是否可以预测整个 FMS™ 的表现。
研究设计
队列研究。
方法
103 名大学运动员接受了休赛期 FMS™ 测试。 DS 和调整后的 FMS™ 综合得分被分为低表现组和高性能组，DS 得分低于 2 的运动员被归类为低表现，调整后的 FMS™ 综合得分低于 12 的运动员被归类为低表现。 2 或以上和 12 或以上的分数分别被认为是 DS 测试和调整后的 FMS™ 综合分数的高表现，因此运动功能障碍和潜在伤害的风险较低。
结果
DS 测试结果被归类为低绩效的个人调整后的 FMS™ 综合得分较低 (p<<0.001)。 DS 评分与调整后的 FMS™ 综合评分呈正相关（ρ = 0.50，p < 0.001）。二项式逻辑回归确定 DS 和 FMS™ 性能类别之间的优势比为 3.56（95% CI：1.24、10.23，p = 0.018）。
结论
DS 测试的表现可以预测 FMS™ 的表现，并帮助识别需要进一步肌肉骨骼评估的个人。需要进一步研究以确定 DS 性能是否可以预测 FMS™ 期间的不对称性。
证据水平
3 级。
BACKGROUND
The Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) has been suggested for use in predicting injury risk in active populations, but time constraints may limit use of the screening test battery. Identifying one component of the FMS™ that can predict which individuals may perform poorly on the entire test, and therefore should undergo the full group of screening maneuvers, may reduce time constraints and increase pre-participation screening utilization.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to determine if performance on the FMS™ overhead deep squat test (DS) could predict performance on the entire FMS™.
STUDY DESIGN
Cohort study.
METHODS
One hundred and three collegiate athletes underwent offseason FMS™ testing. The DS and adjusted FMS™ composite scores were dichotomized into low performance and high performance groups with athletes scoring below 2 on the DS categorized as low performance, and athletes with adjusted FMS™ composite scores below 12 categorized as low performance. Scores of 2 or above and 12 or above were considered high performances for the DS test and adjusted FMS™ composite score respectively, and therefore low risk for movement dysfunction and potentially, injury.
RESULTS
Individuals categorized as low performance as a result of the DS test had lower adjusted FMS™ composite scores (p < 0.001). DS scores were positively correlated with adjusted FMS™ composite scores (ρ = 0.50, p < 0.001). Binomial logistic regression identified an odds ratio of 3.56 (95% CI: 1.24, 10.23, p = 0.018) between DS and FMS™ performance categories.
CONCLUSIONS
Performance on the DS test may predict performance on the FMS™ and help identify individuals who require further musculoskeletal assessment. Further research is needed to determine if DS performance can predict asymmetries during the FMS™.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level 3.