The Coherence of Organizational Structure as an Entity

The Coherence of Organizational Structure as an Entity
复制标题

作为一个实体的组织结构的一致性

DOI:
10.1080/00208825.1980.11656296
复制
发表时间:
1980
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
K. Mreła
K. Mreła
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
K. Mreła

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

与Selznick(1949)、Merton(1949)、Gerth(1952)、Goulthus(1955)、Presthus(1961)或Thompson(1961)不同,Udy(1959)、Pugh和Hickson等研究人员(1963,1976)、霍尔(1962)和哈格(1965,1967)采用了一种方法,将组织结构赋予多维概念的地位。早期研究视角的弱点在于,它使研究者只能研究一般的结构,结构的类型,而不能研究特定的结构特征和它们之间的关系。选择组织结构多维概念的研究的局限性在于,尽管看起来似乎自相矛盾,但它们只触及了组织结构本身。但是,
Unlike Selznick (1949), Merton (1949), Gerth (1952), Gouldner (1955), Presthus (1961), or Thompson (1961), researchers such as Udy (1959), Pugh and Hickson (1963, 1976), Hall (1962), and Hage (1965, 1967) have adopted an approach that assigns organizational structure the status of a multidimensional concept. The weak point of the earlier research perspective was that it enabled researchers to examine no more than structures in general, types of structures, without investigating particular structural characteristics and relations among them. The limitation of studies opting for the multidimensional concept of organizational structure was that, paradoxical as it may seem, they only touched on structures as such. But the sum of even