Comparison of Inspection Data by Difference in Odour Inspection Kit (Including Results of Young and Old Age)

Comparison of Inspection Data by Difference in Odour Inspection Kit (Including Results of Young and Old Age)
复制标题

气味检测套件差异检测数据对比(包括年轻和老年结果)

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
J. of Health Science
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
T. Nakashima
T. Nakashima
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
N. Katayama;Shoko Kondo;Yui Nakayama;T. Nakada;Seiya Goto;Satofumi Sugimoto;WakakoKinoshita;Masaaki Teranisi;M. Sone;Y. Fujimoto;H. Otake;Hirokazu Suzuki;NaokiSaji;S. Nakata;T. Nakashima

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本研究探讨了十年的嗅觉功能之间的关系。根据名古屋女子大学研究数据库计算个人功能测试,并对健康的年轻人和老年人进行气味棒识别测试和开放式香精识别测试。参加者是自愿参加名古屋女子大学研究并自己管理日常生活的社区居民。我们结合2018年的数据,检查了两种嗅觉测量结果。这些数据是从一份咨询结果清单中得出的,该清单是亲手交给一名受试者的。测试年龄从40岁到80岁,从10岁到20岁。根据世代(年轻年龄为20.1 ± 0.7岁,老年年龄为74.5 ± 10.0岁)比较数据。我们进行了两种嗅觉测试。气味棒识别测试(OSIT-J)用于评估气味感知。该测验具有较高的信度和效度。OSIT-J包括12种不同的气味剂。气味本质识别测试也用于评估气味感知。它还包括12种不同的气味被识别。我们比较了两代人的回答,并比较了两次嗅觉测试的结果。结果,在两项嗅觉测试结果中,年轻人和老年人的正确答案总数没有统计学上的显著差异。另外,我们比较了青年人和老年人在两种嗅觉检查中正确回答数增加的情况,同样的人,和减少的人,但没有统计学上的显著差异。而印度墨水和香水与家用(家用)煤气两种嗅觉测试结果与青年人和老年人相比,差异有统计学意义。从本研究结果发现,两种嗅觉测试的结果可以一起作为正确回答率数结果的研究结果。然而,很明显,小心处理是必要的个人气味。
The present study examined the relationship between olfactory function for ten years. A personal function test was calculated from the Nagoya Women’s University study database, and the odor stick identification test and open essence identification test were administered to healthy young and elderly people. The participants were community dwellers who voluntarily participated in the Nagoya Women’s University Study and had managed everyday life by themselves. We combined data of 2018 and checked two kinds of the olfactometry result. These data were made from a consultation result list which was handed to a testee by hand. The test age was in his/her 80s from 40s and in his/her 20s from 10s. The data were compared according to the generation (young age is 20.1 ± 0.7 years old and old age is 74.5 ± 10.0 years old). We conducted two kinds of olfaction tests. The Odour Stick Identification Test (OSIT-J) was used to assess odour perception. This test possesses high reliability and validity. The OSIT-J includes 12 different odorants to be identified. The Odour Essence Identification Test was used to assess odour perception, too. It also includes 12 different odorants to be identified. We compared the answer of generation and compared the results of the two olfactory tests. As a result, there were no statistically significant differences in the total number of correct answers in young people and old people in the two olfactory test results. In addition, we compare young people and old people who increased the number of correct answer in the two kinds of olfactory examination, the same person, and those who decreased, but there was no statistically significant difference. However, there were statistically significant differences between India ink and perfume and Household (domestic) gas compared with young people and old people with two kinds of olfactory test results. From the results of this study, it was found that the results of two kinds of olfactory test can be used together as a research result for the result of correct answer rate number. However, it became clear that careful handing is necessary for individual smell.
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjj037
发表时间: 2006-05-01
期刊: CHEMICAL SENSES
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Kobayashi, M;Saito, S;Costanzo, RM
通讯作者: Costanzo, RM