Michael D. Swaine (2011) America’s Challenge: Engaging a Rising China in the Twenty-First Century. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Michael D. Swaine (2011) America’s Challenge: Engaging a Rising China in the Twenty-First Century. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
复制标题
Michael D. Swaine (2011) 美国的挑战:二十一世纪与崛起的中国接触:华盛顿特区:卡内基国际和平基金会。
DOI:
10.1163/15685314-12341285
复制
发表时间:
2013
影响因子:
0.6
通讯作者:
J. Granville
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Granville
Diplomacy, as Henry Kissinger famously remarked, is ‘the art of restraining power’. The National Security Advisor for Richard Nixon who orchestrated the establishment of US diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China in the 1970s was fond of playing the ‘China card’against the Soviet Union, and vice versa. Today, in the second decade of the twenty-first century, US diplomacy toward China must be broader and more sophisticated than simply restraining power. In his latest book, America’s Challenge, Michael D. Swaine warns against the ‘dangerous zero-sum mindset’he sees ‘growing in the defense communities’ in both countries, leading some US analysts to ‘assert the need for the US to maintain clear predominance over Beijing at whatever cost’(p. 16). As Swaine points out, the Chinese aspire* overtly, at least* to a ‘mutually beneficial, win-win cooperative pattern’[huli shuangying de hezuo geju](p. 32).In fact, given America’s worsening economic plight, a domineering approach by the US could be downright ‘self-defeating’and ‘even spur Chinese efforts to challenge US military capabilities on issues such as Taiwan’(p. 16). Washington policymakers should eschew such zero-sum thinking, Swaine writes, and instead try to incorporate China further into bilateral and multilateral organizations (p. 16). In contrast to the George W. Bush Administration, which called China a ‘strategic competitor’, Washington should encourage China to behave as a ‘responsible stakeholder’. Swaine advocates a policy of combined cooperative engagement and cautious ‘hedging’.