Achieving convergent evidence through divergent approaches.
Achieving convergent evidence through divergent approaches.
复制标题
通过不同的方法获得趋同的证据。
DOI：
10.1006/brcg.1999.1169
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Berenbaum,SA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bulman-Fleming,MB;Grimshaw,GM;Berenbaum,SA
这本杂志的活力证明了在过去的一千年中，在理解大脑和认知之间的关系方面所取得的进展。在本世纪的第一个世纪，我们对行为神经科学的希望是建立在我们领域基础之上的认知的广泛概念化。我们看到未来的工作是认识到认知与情感、人格和社会推理的相互作用，尊重多种方法论方法，保持行为神经科学的最佳传统，同时适当利用新技术。认知神经科学家传统上在智力能力的有限领域工作，但这为我们的基本问题提供了一个不完整的答案：“人们实际上在做什么，他们是如何做的？”这个问题的答案需要良好的行为观察和强大的方法控制。正如我们的朋友和导师菲尔·布莱登所说：“许多研究人员似乎忘记了他们是在与活跃、诡计多端的人类打交道。”新贡献
The vitality of this Journal attests to the progress made in understanding the relations between brain and cognition in the past millennium. Our hope for behavioral neuroscience in the first century of the present millennium is for a broad conceptualization of cognition that builds upon the foundations of our field. We see the future in work that recognizes the reciprocal interplay of cognition with affect, personality, and social reasoning, and that honors a multitude of methodological approaches, maintaining the best traditions of behavioral neuroscience while taking advantage of new technologies as appropriate.Cognitive neuroscientists have traditionally worked within the limited domain of intellectual abilities, but this provides an incomplete answer to our fundamental question:‘‘What are people actually doing and how are they doing it?’’The answer to this question requires good behavioral observation with strong methodological control. As our friend and mentor, Phil Bryden, said ‘‘Many researchers seem to have forgotten that they are dealing with active, scheming human beings’’(Bryden, 1982, p. 14). Recent contributions