IDEOLOGY AND POLITICAL-ECONOMY IN INQUIRY - ACTION RESEARCH AND PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH
IDEOLOGY AND POLITICAL-ECONOMY IN INQUIRY - ACTION RESEARCH AND PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/002188638301900306
复制
发表时间：
1983-01-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
TANDON, R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BROWN, LD;TANDON, R
应用行为科学的传播需要适应新的环境和受众，在新环境中的应用可以产生新的见解。本文探讨了应用行为科学探究的两种传统——“行动研究”和“参与式研究”——它们拥护许多相似的价值观，并在非常不同的环境中采用共同的方法。作者作为应用行为科学家在彼此的国家（美国和印度）一起工作，将共同的概念设备应用于不同的文化、政治和经济环境。我们使用了行动研究和参与式研究方法来进行探究（例如，Brown & Tandon，1978；Tandon & Brown，1981），本文重点关注这些方法之间的意识形态、政治和经济差异。
The spread of applied behavioral science requires adaptation to new circumstances and audiences, and applications in new settings can generate new insights. This paper examines two traditions of applied behavioral science inquiry-“action research” and “participatory research"–that espouse many similar values and employ common methods in very different settings. The authors have worked together as applied behavioral scientists in each other's countries (the United States and India), applying common conceptual equipment to diverse cultural, political, and economic settings. We have used both action research and participatory research approaches to inquiry (eg, Brown & Tandon, 1978; Tandon & Brown, 1981), and this paper focuses on the ideological, political, and economic differences between these approaches.