EFL and/vs. ESL?: A multi-level regression modeling perspective on bridging the paradigm gap
EFL and/vs. ESL?: A multi-level regression modeling perspective on bridging the paradigm gap
复制标题
EFL 和/vs.
DOI：
10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.05gri
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Sandra C. Deshors
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Gries;Sandra C. Deshors
对学习者语言和本土化语言的研究是英语语料库语言学研究中不断发展的领域，这是由两个当前趋势形成的：第一，认识到迫切需要更严格的方法方法（除了少数例外，现有的工作是基于过度/未充分使用的频率计数，无法揭示复杂的非母语语言模式）；第二，共同努力弥合EFL和ESL研究之间存在的“范式差距”（Sridhar & Sridhar 1986）。本文通过对德语/法语学习者和香港/印度/新加坡英语使用者在口语和写作中与格交替的17个词汇动词进行多因素分析，为这些发展做出贡献。我们举例说明了分层混合效果建模的优点，它允许我们控制说话人和动词特定的效果，也可以控制语料库数据的分层结构。其次，我们讨论了EFL和ESL是代表独立的英语变体还是一个连续体的理论问题。
The study of learner language and that of indigenized varieties are growing areas of English-language corpus-linguistic research, which are shaped by two current trends: First, the recognition that more rigorous methodological approaches are urgently needed (with few exceptions, existing work is based on over-/under-use frequency counts that fail to unveil complex non-native linguistic patterns); second, the collective effort to bridge an existing “paradigm gap” (Sridhar & Sridhar 1986) between EFL and ESL research.This paper contributes to these developments by offering a multifactorial analysis of seventeen lexical verbs in the dative alternation in speech and writing of German/French learners and Hong Kong/India/Singapore English speakers. We exemplify the advantages of hierarchical mixed-effects modeling, which allows us to control for speaker and verb-specific effects, but also for the hierarchical structure of the corpus data. Second, we address the theoretical question of whether EFL and ESL represent discrete English varieties or a continuum.
IL、L1 和 TL 语料库的多重比较
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
Corpora and Language Learners (Studies in Corpus Linguistics) 18
影响因子：
--
作者：
Tono;Yukio
通讯作者：
Yukio