Discussion: On the Very Real Distinction Between Fuzzy and Statistical Methods
Discussion: On the Very Real Distinction Between Fuzzy and Statistical Methods
复制标题
讨论：模糊方法和统计方法之间的真正区别
DOI：
10.1080/00401706.1995.10484331
复制
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Pacheco
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Kandel;A. Martins;R. Pacheco
在这个讨论中，我们回顾了Laviolette， Seaman， Barrett和Woodall的主要评论。首先，我们考察了概率的主观主义观点如何根据认知观点来面对建模人类推理的任务。然后，我们研究了作者所分析的模糊控制器和概率控制器的性质，反驳了相似性假设。结果表明，由于理论基础的不同，模糊控制器的代表性在接近专家知识方面优于概率控制器。我们还回顾了作者对模糊和概率方法监测多项过程的比较，强调了作者分析中的偏差和误解。
In this discussion we review the main remarks of Laviolette, Seaman, Barrett, and Woodall. First, we examine how the subjectivist view of probability faces the task of modeling human reasoning according to a cognitive viewpoint. We then investigate the nature of the fuzzy and probabilistic controllers analyzed by the authors, refuting the hypothesis of similarity. We show that, due to the different theoretical basis, the representativeness of the fuzzy controller overcomes the probabilistic controller in resembling the expert's knowledge. We also review the authors'comparison between the fuzzy and probabilistic approaches to monitor multinomial processes, emphasizing biases and misconceptions in the authors' analysis.