National Red Listing Beyond the 2010 Target
National Red Listing Beyond the 2010 Target
复制标题
超越 2010 年目标的国家红色名录
DOI：
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01492.x
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
6.3
通讯作者：
B. Collen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Zamin;J. Baillie;Rebecca M. Miller;J. Rodríguez;A. Ardid;B. Collen
翻译后摘要：根据《生物多样性公约》和联合国千年发展目标的通过，在国家一级的生物多样性的现状和趋势的信息，在2010年生物多样性目标的创建已变得越来越重要的科学和政策。 受威胁物种的国家红色名录（NRL）可以提供适当的数据来报告实现这些目标的进展情况并为国家保护优先事项的制定提供信息。这些信息对于制定基于物种和生态系统的气候变化适应战略也将变得越来越重要。我们对109个国家的NRL进行了全面的全球审查，并从地理和分类学角度分析了NRL覆盖范围的差距，以确定进一步投资的优先区域和分类组。然后，我们研究了NRL数据集与国内生产总值（GDP）和脊椎动物物种丰富度之间的相关性。最大的地理差距在大洋洲，其次是中非，加勒比和西非，而最大的分类差距是无脊椎动物，真菌和地衣。在一个特定的国家内NRL覆盖的全面性与GDP呈正相关，与总脊椎动物丰富度和受威胁脊椎动物丰富度呈负相关。这支持了生物多样性最大和最脆弱的区域得到的养护关注最少的说法，并表明财政资源可能是一个整体限制因素。为了提高NRL的覆盖率，我们建议将针对代表性不足的分类群或地区的项目与为各国提供自行创建或更新NRL的手段的项目相结合。我们建议将改善区域内和区域间的知识转移作为未来投资的优先事项。
Abstract: Following creation of the 2010 Biodiversity Target under the Convention on Biological Diversity and adoption of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals, information on status and trends of biodiversity at the national level has become increasingly important to both science and policy. National red lists (NRLs) of threatened species may provide suitable data for reporting on progress toward these goals and for informing national conservation priority setting. This information will also become increasingly important for developing species‐ and ecosystem‐based strategies for climate change adaptation. We conducted a thorough global review of NRLs in 109 countries and analyzed gaps in NRL coverage in terms of geography and taxonomy to determine priority regions and taxonomic groups for further investment. We then examined correlations between the NRL data set and gross domestic product (GDP) and vertebrate species richness. The largest geographic gap was in Oceania, followed by middle Africa, the Caribbean, and western Africa, whereas the largest taxonomic gaps were for invertebrates, fungi, and lichens. The comprehensiveness of NRL coverage within a given country was positively correlated with GDP and negatively correlated with total vertebrate richness and threatened vertebrate richness. This supports the assertion that regions with the greatest and most vulnerable biodiversity receive the least conservation attention and indicates that financial resources may be an integral limitation. To improve coverage of NRLs, we propose a combination of projects that target underrepresented taxa or regions and projects that provide the means for countries to create or update NRLs on their own. We recommend improvements in knowledge transfer within and across regions as a priority for future investment.