Perceived Justice and Reactions to Coercive Computers
Perceived Justice and Reactions to Coercive Computers
复制标题
感知的正义和对强制计算机的反应
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Daniel B. Shank
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Daniel B. Shank
社会学和正义理论表明，强制行为会产生一种不公平感，但如果计算机是这种强制的近端来源呢？我认为人们将正义归于计算机，但与人类不同——人们可能认为计算机的行为是不公正的，但并不像人类的行为那样不公正。同样，个体也会抵制和报复强制行为，但如果胁迫者是一台电脑，那么这种行为就会减少。这些假设是从社会交换的正义研究中延伸出来的。具体来说，我扩展了Molm等人（1993）关于社会交换中的强迫的实验室实验，增加了人类与计算机的身份条件。我进行了一个实验室实验（N = 121），复制了Molm等人的研究，并支持了对强制计算机的正义、抵抗和报复的假设。
Sociology and justice theories indicate that coercive behavior creates a sense of injustice, but what if a computer is the proximal source of this coercion? I argue that people attribute justice to computers, but do so differently than to humans—people may perceive computers’ behavior as unjust, but not as unjust as the same behavior by humans. Likewise, individuals resist and retaliate against coercive behavior, but do so less if the coercer is a computer. These hypotheses are extended from justice studies in social exchange. Specifically, I expand on Molm et al.’s (1993) laboratory experiment of coercion in social exchange, adding a human versus computer identity condition. I conduct a laboratory experiment (N = 121) that replicates Molm et al.’s study and supports the hypotheses on justice, resistance, and retaliation to coercive computers.