Political love: affect, instrumentalism and dual citizenship legislation in the Philippines
Political love: affect, instrumentalism and dual citizenship legislation in the Philippines
复制标题
政治之爱：菲律宾的情感、工具主义和双重国籍立法
DOI：
10.1080/13621025.2018.1538317
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Filomeo V. Aguilar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Filomeo V. Aguilar
摘要与双重国籍的研究，指出需要深入了解这一立法变化背后的原因，这项研究提供了一个分析的话语，立法者parlayed在辩论中，导致在2003年通过的菲律宾国籍保留和重新获得法律。由于宪法禁止双重效忠，立法者构建了一个具有情感力量的叙事，以证明移民和目的地归化的合理性，后者被描绘为缺乏菲律宾人应该为祖国保留的政治爱。作为情感公民身份的象征，尽管国家实际上将其工具化，但该法的通过肯定了排他性单一公民身份的传统观念，同时为海外的connationals提供了间接的双重非排他性公民身份的宽容。
ABSTRACT In line with studies of dual citizenship that point to the need for in-depth understanding of the reasoning behind this legislative change, this study provides an analysis of the discourse that lawmakers parlayed during the debate that resulted in the passage of the Philippine citizenship retention and reacquisition law in 2003. Because of the constitutional prohibition against dual allegiance, legislators constructed a narrative with emotive force to justify emigration as well as naturalization in the destination, the latter act portrayed as devoid of political love that Filipinos supposedly reserve for the homeland. Emblematic of affective citizenship even while the state actually instrumentalized it, the passage of the law affirmed a traditional notion of exclusive singular citizenship, while concomitantly providing indirect tolerance of dual, nonexclusive citizenship for conationals overseas.