Evolutionary tuning of protein expression levels of a positively autoregulated two-component system.
Evolutionary tuning of protein expression levels of a positively autoregulated two-component system.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1003927
复制
发表时间:
2013-10
期刊:
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Stock AM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gao R;Stock AM
Cellular adaptation relies on the development of proper regulatory schemes for accurate control of gene expression levels in response to environmental cues. Over- or under-expression can lead to diminished cell fitness due to increased costs or insufficient benefits. Positive autoregulation is a common regulatory scheme that controls protein expression levels and gives rise to essential features in diverse signaling systems, yet its roles in cell fitness are less understood. It remains largely unknown how much protein expression is ‘appropriate’ for optimal cell fitness under specific extracellular conditions and how the dynamic environment shapes the regulatory scheme to reach appropriate expression levels. Here, we investigate the correlation of cell fitness and output response with protein expression levels of the E. coli PhoB/PhoR two-component system (TCS). In response to phosphate (Pi)-depletion, the PhoB/PhoR system activates genes involved in phosphorus assimilation as well as genes encoding themselves, similarly to many other positively autoregulated TCSs. We developed a bacteria competition assay in continuous cultures and discovered that different Pi conditions have conflicting requirements of protein expression levels for optimal cell fitness. Pi-replete conditions favored cells with low levels of PhoB/PhoR while Pi-deplete conditions selected for cells with high levels of PhoB/PhoR. These two levels matched PhoB/PhoR concentrations achieved via positive autoregulation in wild-type cells under Pi-replete and -deplete conditions, respectively. The fitness optimum correlates with the wild-type expression level, above which the phosphorylation output saturates, thus further increase in expression presumably provides no additional benefits. Laboratory evolution experiments further indicate that cells with non-ideal protein levels can evolve toward the optimal levels with diverse mutational strategies. Our results suggest that the natural protein expression levels and feedback regulatory schemes of TCSs are evolved to match the phosphorylation output of the system, which is determined by intrinsic activities of TCS proteins. Different proteins are expressed at different levels that may have evolved for optimal fitness under specific environmental conditions. Additionally, cells regulate protein expression levels in response to environmental changes. For signaling proteins whose benefits are not immediately proportional to their expression levels, it is less understood whether expression levels are optimized and how protein expression levels correlate with the output responses they regulate. We developed a continuous culture competition assay to examine cell fitness at different expression levels of the E. coli PhoB/PhoR system. The PhoB/PhoR system, which induces expression of genes for phosphate assimilation under phosphate (Pi)-limited conditions, represents an archetype of the widely distributed prokaryotic two-component signal transduction scheme. Wild-type cells express different levels of PhoB/PhoR under different Pi conditions; these levels provide near maximal fitness under respective conditions. Under Pi-deplete conditions where PhoB-regulated gene expression is important for survival, the optimal expression level appears to correlate with the phosphorylation output of the PhoB/PhoR system. Challenging cells with expression of unfavorable levels of proteins led to diverse mutations that all shifted protein expression towards optimal levels. Our results indicate that the autoregulatory scheme and expression levels of the PhoB/PhoR system are evolved to provide optimal fitness.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Dekel, E;Alon, U
通讯作者:
Alon, U
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Eames, Matt;Kortemme, Tanja
通讯作者:
Kortemme, Tanja
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Haldimann, A;Daniels, LL;Wanner, BL
通讯作者:
Wanner, BL
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Levine JH;Fontes ME;Dworkin J;Elowitz MB
通讯作者:
Elowitz MB
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.120163297
发表时间:
2000-06-06
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Datsenko, KA;Wanner, BL
通讯作者:
Wanner, BL