Laboratory diagnosis of malaria
Laboratory diagnosis of malaria
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/jcp.49.7.533
复制
发表时间:
1996-07-01
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Williams, JE
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Warhurst, DC;Williams, JE
Samples for blood film diagnosis For malaria diagnosis blood should ideally be taken direct from the patient's finger or ear and the smears prepared at the bedside or in the clinic. Films adhere better to the slides, leave a clearer background after lysis, and parasite and red cell changes are minimal. If it is necessary to use anticoagulants, then the films should be made as soon as possible, certainly less than three hours, after the blood was drawn. EDTA is superior to other anticoagulants for this purpose. Parasite and red blood cell morphology can be seriously affected if the blood has been in anticoagulant for too long. 3 Further development of the sexual stages may occur (even within 20 minutes under the right conditions) and the male gametes re-leased into the plasma may be mistaken for other organisms, such as Borrelia. They may be distinguished from Borrelia by the central loca-tion of the red-staining nucleus, and the absence of notable, repetitive sinuous curves. If parasitised blood is left at warm laboratory temperature, red cells may be invaded by released merozoites. This may lead-for exam-ple, to the occurrence of appreciable numbers of" accole" forms, characteristic of P falciparum, in blood parasitised by P vivax. Heavier parasitaemias left for several hours may lead to the serious deterioration of the already delicate parasitised erythrocytes, owing to a build-up of acid in the blood sample. Those parasitised with early P vivax forms may shrink or become crenated. Later stages of the parasite may become compact, and the eryth-rocyte membrane may become very delicate so that it stretches when the film is prepared. Pro-longed exposure, for more than 10-12 hours, may result in the total destruction of the later stages of P vivax, making recognition difficult or, in some instances, impossible. Blood should, if possible, be taken during or after pyrexia, and before the administration of antimalarial drugs. Drug treatment, besides making parasitaemia harder to detect, causes confusing morphological changes in the para-sites. Chloroquine-for example, causes clumping of pigment vesicles and can lead to other species being mistaken for Pfalciparum. Where a bone marrow biopsy specimenis available, this may be a fruitful specimen for malaria diagnosis. Buffy coat smears may be useful for the detection of scanty maturing stages and gametocytes, but are not recom-mended routinely.For routine diagnosis of malaria, four thin and four thick blood films should be prepared. One of the thin films, stained with Giemsa, should be adequate for detection of normal parasitaemias and for determination of species. To save time, where essential, the rapid Field's technique may be used, but should be backed up by Giemsa stained thin films. The thick films should be stained using Giemsa or Field's stain. Ifproblems with diagnosis arise the other films are available for further study. In addition, the PHLS Malaria Reference Laboratory would appreciate having unstained films, both thick and thin, for confirmation.(Malaria isa notifiable disease in the UK.) If