A cautionary note on the power of the test for the indirect effect in mediation analysis.
A cautionary note on the power of the test for the indirect effect in mediation analysis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01549
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Vansteelandt S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Loeys T;Moerkerke B;Vansteelandt S
Recent simulation studies have pointed to the higher power of the test for the mediated effect vs. the test for the total effect, even in the presence of a direct effect. This has motivated applied researchers to investigate mediation in settings where there is no evidence of a total effect. In this paper we provide analytical insight into the circumstances under which higher power of the test for the mediated effect vs. the test for the total effect can be expected in the absence of a direct effect. We argue that the acclaimed power gain is somewhat deceptive and comes with a big price. On the basis of the results, we recommend that when the primary interest lies in mediation only, a significant test for the total effect should not be used as a prerequisite for the test for the indirect effect. However, because the test for the indirect effect is vulnerable to bias when common causes of mediator and outcome are not measured or not accounted for, it should be evaluated in a sensitivity analysis.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
BARON, RM;KENNY, DA
通讯作者:
KENNY, DA
DOI:
10.1023/a:1026595011371
发表时间:
2000-12-01
期刊:
Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research
影响因子:
--
作者:
MacKinnon, D P;Krull, J L;Lockwood, C M
通讯作者:
Lockwood, C M
影响因子:
7
作者:
Imai, Kosuke;Keele, Luke;Tingley, Dustin
通讯作者:
Tingley, Dustin
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Fritz MS;Taylor AB;Mackinnon DP
通讯作者:
Mackinnon DP
影响因子:
8.2
作者:
Fritz, Matthew S.;MacKinnon, David P.
通讯作者:
MacKinnon, David P.