The Complexities and Potential of Theorizing Gender, Caste, Race, and Class
The Complexities and Potential of Theorizing Gender, Caste, Race, and Class
复制标题
性别、种姓、种族和阶级理论化的复杂性和潜力
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. King
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Brewer;Cecilia A. Conrad;M. King
大多数经济学家还没有解决交叉性学术的要求，交叉性学术承认性别、种族、阶级、种姓和其他对个人和群体经济状况的影响是相互交织的。在经济学家中，女权主义经济学家可能取得了最大的进步，也最有可能取得进一步的突破，尽管我们可以做得更好，还有很多工作要做。本文综合了交叉研究的案例，回顾了经济学文献的现状，描述了本期《女性主义经济学》特刊中关于“性别、肤色、种姓和阶级”的文章的贡献，并概述了未来的方向。
Most economists have not yet grappled with the demands of intersectional scholarship, which recognizes the intertwined nature of gender, race, class, caste and other influences on the economic situation of individuals and groups. Among economists, feminist economists may have made the most progress and be best positioned to break further ground, though we can do better and much remains to be done. This article synthesizes the case for intersectional work, reviews the state of the economic literature, describes the contributions of the articles in this special issue of Feminist Economics on "gender, color, caste and class," and sketches directions for the future.