Lexical Modulation without Concepts Lexical Modulation without Concepts

Lexical Modulation without Concepts Lexical Modulation without Concepts
复制标题

没有概念的词汇调制 没有概念的词汇调制

DOI:
10.1111/1746-8361.12190
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Allott N
Allott N
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Allott N

文献摘要

相似文献

我们反对文献中的主流观点,即概念(被理解为一般术语的常设意义)在词汇调制中被调制。我们还反对另一种观点,即“抓斗袋”的信息,不确定扩展是词汇调制的起点。在回应这些观点的问题,我们概述了一个新的模式,词汇调制,免除了假设,有一个常设的意义,是在考虑中的情况下修改的一般术语。在应用一般术语时,我们打算与我们的语言祖先保持一致,这样做,我们就理所当然地认为这些术语所指的事实。在词汇调节的情况下,我们意识到我们认为理所当然的事实,我们需要改变我们认为理所当然的事实,以便看到自己在实践中的持续性。这些变化导致了通用术语指代不同属性的话语。一般来说,概念既不是词汇调整的起点,也不是词汇的固定意义。
We argue against the dominant view in the literature that concepts (understood as the standing meanings of general terms) are modulated in lexical modulation. We also argue against the alternative view that ‘grab bags’ of information that don’t determine extensions are the starting point for lexical modulation. In response to the problems with these views we outline a new model for lexical modulation that dispenses with the assumption that there is a standing meaning of a general term that is modified in the cases under consideration. In applying general terms we intend to conform with our linguistic ancestors and in doing so we take facts about the referents of these terms for granted. In cases of lexical modulation we become aware of facts we took for granted and we need to change the facts we take for granted in order to see ourselves as continuing in a practice. These changes result in utterances of the general term referring to different properties. In general, concepts are neither the starting point for lexical modulation nor the standing meanings of words.