Reply to the comments of W. Helland-Hansen on "Towards the standardization of sequence stratigraphy" by Catuneanu et al. (Earth-Sciences Review 92(2009)1-33)

Reply to the comments of W. Helland-Hansen on "Towards the standardization of sequence stratigraphy" by Catuneanu et al. (Earth-Sciences Review 92(2009)1-33)
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.02.004
复制
发表时间:
2009-05
影响因子:
12.1
通讯作者:
O. Catuneanu;V. Abreu;J. Bhattacharya;M. Blum;R. Dalrymple;P. Eriksson;C. Fielding;W. Fisher
O. Catuneanu;V. Abreu;J. Bhattacharya;M. Blum;R. Dalrymple;P. Eriksson;C. Fielding;W. Fisher
中科院分区:
地球科学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
O. Catuneanu;V. Abreu;J. Bhattacharya;M. Blum;R. Dalrymple;P. Eriksson;C. Fielding;W. Fisher

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们感谢William Helland-Hansen对我们论文的赞扬和反馈。我们的目标是通过使用一种中立的方法来建立层序地层学的共识,这种方法专注于与模型无关的基本概念,因为这些是各种方法所共有的。寻找共同点就是我们所说的“标准化”,而不是为层序地层表面的位置强加一套严格的、不灵活的规则。我们的工作旨在消除层序地层学在方法和命名上的混乱,这种混乱主要是由于方法发展过程中不协调的努力和术语的激增造成的,这些术语不必要地复杂。
We thank William Helland-Hansen for his compliments and feedback on our paper. We aimed to establish a consensus in sequence stratigraphy by using a neutral approach that focused on model-independent, fundamental concepts, because these are the ones common to various approaches. This search for common ground is what we meant by “standardization,” not the imposition of a strict, inflexible set of rules for the placement of sequence-stratigraphic surfaces. Our work is meant to eliminate the present state of methodological and nomenclatural confusion within sequence stratigraphy, which is largely the result of uncoordinated effort in the development of the method and the proliferation of terminology that is unnecessarily complex.[...]