THE ROLE OF CHARGE AND HYDROPHOBICITY IN PEPTIDE LIPID INTERACTION - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY BASED ON TRYPTOPHAN FLUORESCENCE MEASUREMENTS COMBINED WITH THE USE OF AQUEOUS AND HYDROPHOBIC QUENCHERS
THE ROLE OF CHARGE AND HYDROPHOBICITY IN PEPTIDE LIPID INTERACTION - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY BASED ON TRYPTOPHAN FLUORESCENCE MEASUREMENTS COMBINED WITH THE USE OF AQUEOUS AND HYDROPHOBIC QUENCHERS
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/bi00488a006
复制
发表时间:
1990-09-11
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
DEKRUIJFF, B
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
DEKROON, AIP;SOEKARJO, MW;DEKRUIJFF, B
Revised Manuscript Received May 8, 1990 abstract: The interaction of interrelated modelpeptides with model membranes has been studied by techniques based on tryptophan fluorescence. The peptides used are derivatives of the sequence H-Ala-Met-Leu-Trp-Ala-OH, which was designed for this purpose. Several modifications yielded a set of 13 penta-and hexapeptidesvarying in net charge, hydrophobicity, charge distribution, and the intramolecular position of the tryptophan residue with respect to the charge (s). The affinity of these peptides for small unilamellar vesicles (SUV) consisting of zwitterionic egg phosphatidylcholine (eggPC) and negatively charged beef heart cardiolipin (bhCL) has been investigated in a comparative way. The criteria for affinity comprise (1) intrinsic fluorescence changes upon titration of the peptides with the lipid vesicles,(2) reduced accessibility of the peptides to aqueous quenchers of tryptophan fluorescence (L and acrylamide) in the presence of lipid, and (3) exposure to membrane-incorporated fluorescence quenchers, brominated phosphatidylcholines (BrPC). Application of BrPC brominated at different positions along the acyl chains provided information on the membrane topology of the peptides. With respect to the extent of affinity for zwitterionic membranes, the overall hydrophobicity of the peptides is the main determinant. A comparison of the affinity for PC of equally hydrophobic peptides carrying either a single positive or negative charge reveals preferential interaction of the cationic peptide. Both hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions determine the affinity of positively charged mono-and divalent peptides for CL vesicles. The distribution of the charged moieties in divalent positively charged peptides, either both at one end of the molecule or one at each end, has little influence on the affinity of these peptides for CL but does affect the extent of exposure to BrPC. Upon decreasing the surface charge density of the vesicles by diluting CL with increasing amounts of PC, both types of peptides show different behavior. The position of the tryptophan relative to the charged moiety in the peptide molecule is shown to affect the fluorescent properties upon interaction with vesicles. Concerning the membrane topology, all peptides adopt a localization near the membrane surface, with the neutral peptides inserting slightly deeper into the bilayer than the chargedpeptides. The results allow a comparative analysis of the factors determining the extents and modes of lipid-model peptide interaction; in addition, the validity of the methods applied is discussed. e functional role that lipid-peptide interactions play in a wide range of biological processes is acquiring growing ex-perimental support. For example, there is increasing evidence in favor of a direct interaction of signal peptides and of mitochondrial presequences with the membrane lipids playing a role at some stage of the membrane insertion or translocation process of precursor proteins [for review see Briggs and Gierasch (1986) and Roise and Schatz (1988)]. Furthermore, lipid-peptide interactions have been implied to catalyze the binding of regulatory peptides to their receptor and to assist in the selection of the proper receptor subtype in the case of interrelated peptides, eg, the opioid peptides [for review see Sargent et al.(1988)]. Nevertheless, detailed knowledge of the basic molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions is lacking.