Comparison of the Usefulness of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 for Screening for Major Depressive Disorder: Analysis of Psychiatric Outpatient Data

Comparison of the Usefulness of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 for Screening for Major Depressive Disorder: Analysis of Psychiatric Outpatient Data
复制标题

DOI:
10.30773/pi.2019.02.01
复制
发表时间:
2019-04-01
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Han, Changsu
Han, Changsu
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shin, Cheolmin;Lee, Seung-Hoon;Han, Changsu

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的探讨患者健康问卷(PHQ-8)作为重性抑郁障碍(MDD)筛查工具的价值。采用简易国际神经精神访谈法诊断抑郁症。我们推导了PHQ-8和PHQ-9的效度和信度。为评价PHQ-8和PHQ-9对抑郁症的鉴别能力,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并比较两个量表的曲线下面积(AUC)。PHQ-8和PHQ-9的Cronbach’s分别为0.892和0.876。与PHQ-9相似,在相关性分析中,PHQ-8也与汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分相关。当我们绘制PHQ-8和PHQ-9的ROC曲线时,AUC没有统计学显著差异。以10分为界值,PHQ-8的敏感性为58.3%,特异性为83.1%,阳性预测值为53.4%,阴性预测值为85.7%。
Objective This study aimed to demonstrate that the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 is not less useful than the PHQ-9 as a screening test for major depressive disorder (MDD).Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 567 patients in psychiatric outpatient units. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview was used to diagnose MDD. We derived the validity and reliability of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9. To evaluate the ability of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 to discriminate MDD, we drew receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and compared the areas under the curves (AUCs).Results Of the 567 participants, 207 (36.5%) were diagnosed with MDD. Cronbach's as for the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 were 0.892 and 0.876, respectively. Similar to the PHQ-9, the PHQ-8 was also associated with scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in a correlation analysis. When we drew ROC curves for the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9, there was no statistically significant difference in the AUCs. With a cutoff score of 10, the PHQ-8 showed a sensitivity of 58.3%, specificity of 83.1%, positive predictive value of 53.4%, and negative predictive value of 85.7%.Conclusion In a psychiatric outpatient sample, the PHQ-8 was as useful as the PHQ-9 for MDD screening.