Strokes of serendipity: Community co-curation and engagement with digital heritage

Strokes of serendipity: Community co-curation and engagement with digital heritage
复制标题

机缘巧合:社区共同策划和参与数字遗产

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Tim Jackson
Tim Jackson
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Daniel H. Mutibwa;Alison Hess;Tim Jackson

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文探讨了社区主导的数字遗产参与的潜力,通过承担共享文化遗产的责任,激发积极的公民意识,并促进当地社区遗产团体与国家博物馆之间的长期关系。通过名为“科学博物馆:常驻社区”的试点项目,我们发现,尽管与已经忠于英国伦敦科学博物馆并享有现有工作关系的社区团体合作,但由于一系列结构和后勤问题,即使在考虑数字设备和工具的应用之前,这项工作也面临着挑战。尽管存在这些挑战,试点项目发现,为科学博物馆和参与的社区遗产团体之间的面对面对话和互动创造时间和空间,有助于建立有效进行数字共同策展的参数。这反过来又为数字原型的开发提供了信息,该原型具有巨大的潜力,可以实现有关共享遗产的对话的远程虚拟连接和交互。最终目标有两个:(a) 帮助促进对我们共同的过去的协作意义建构;(b) 帮助围绕与公共历史和遗产相关的新兴亲和力、议程和研究问题建立可持续的机构和社区/公共工作联系。
This article explores the potential that community-led digital engagement with heritage holds for stimulating active citizenship through taking responsibility for shared cultural heritage and for fostering long-lasting relationships between local community heritage groups and national museums. Through the lens of a pilot project titled Science Museum: Community-in-Residence, we discovered that – despite working with community groups that were already loyal to and enjoyed existing working ties with the Science Museum in London, United Kingdom – this undertaking proved challenging owing to a range of structural and logistical issues even before the application of digital devices and tools had been considered. These challenges notwithstanding, the pilot found that the creation of time and space for face-to-face dialogue and interactions between the Science Museum and the participating community heritage groups helped to establish the parameters within which digital co-curation can effectively occur. This, in turn, informed the development of a digital prototype with huge potential to enable remote, virtual connectivity to, and interactivity with, conversations about shared heritage. The ultimate goal was twofold: (a) to help facilitate collaborative sense-making of our shared past and (b) to aid the building of sustainable institutional and community/public working ties around emerging affinities, agendas and research questions in relation to public history and heritage.
DOI: 10.1177/1474474014539247
发表时间: 2015-07
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
H. Geoghegan;Alison Hess
通讯作者: H. Geoghegan;Alison Hess