A recipe for impact? Exploring knowledge requirements in the UK Parliament and beyond
A recipe for impact? Exploring knowledge requirements in the UK Parliament and beyond
复制标题
影响力的秘诀？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Brenton J. Prosser
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Geddes;K. Dommett;Brenton J. Prosser
在围绕学术界与政策制定者互动的持续辩论的背景下，本文讨论了学术界如何成功地与经常被忽视的议会机构互动。我们认为，英国议会是不是一个同质的组织，但不同的议会网站有不同的知识要求。虽然研究人员需要克服一些共同的障碍，但没有确保成功的研究影响的通用方法。我们认为，有不同形式的参与可能会导致影响力，合作生产是最重要的方式，学者可以与议会。
In the context of ongoing debates around academic engagements with policymakers, this article discusses how academics can successfully engage with the often overlooked institution of Parliament. We argue that the UK Parliament is not a homogeneous organisation but has differing knowledge requirements for different parliamentary sites. While there are common barriers that need to be overcome by researchers, there is no universal recipe that will ensure successful research impact. We argue that there are different forms of engagement likely to lead to influence, and that co-production is the most important way by which academics can engage with Parliament.
评估议会监督委员会的影响：英国下议院的特别委员会
影响因子：
1.2
作者：
Benton M
通讯作者：
Benton M