DIFFERENTIALLY SIMPLE RINGS WITH NO INVERTIBLE DERIVATIVES

DIFFERENTIALLY SIMPLE RINGS WITH NO INVERTIBLE DERIVATIVES
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/qmath/32.4.417
复制
发表时间:
1981-12
影响因子:
0.7
通讯作者:
D. Jordan
D. Jordan
中科院分区:
数学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Jordan

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

设R是具有非零导子d的交换Noether Q-代数,使得R是d-单的,即R在d下不变的理想只有0和R。众所周知,例如参见[2],第43页,微分多项式R [x,d]的环是简单的诺特环。KR Goodearl [4]问是否必须有R的元素r使得d(r)是可逆的。本文的目的是证明:如果K是特征为零的域,且n5>> 2,则多项式环R=^[* iX 2,···,* n]允许一个K-导子d,使得R是d-单环且d(R)不含单位元. Goodearl问题背后的动机,除了观察到在所有最著名的d-单环的例子中存在可逆导子之外,是一种感觉,简单的环R [x,d]所产生的一个d-简单的环R没有可逆的衍生物可能具有显着不同的性质,从那些已知的简单环的微分多项式。在这样一个例子R [x,d]和例如Weyl代数At(C)之间可以得出的一个区别是,前者允许一个外导子,而后者则不允许(见[3],p.148)。任何微分多项式环R [x,d]都有形式微分的导子dldx,且这个导子是内导子当且仅当存在reR使得d(r)= l. K [x1,x2,...,Xn],我们证明了K [xu* 2»···>* n]^d-简单不是第一个这样的d被构造。J. Archer [1]已经表明,如果K是特征为零的域,则K [xu x2,...,XB]是6-简单的,其中
LET R be a commutative Noetherian Q-algebra with a non-zero derivation d such that R is d-simple, that is the only ideals of R invariant under d are 0 and R. It is well-known, see for example [2], p. 43, that the ring of differential polynomials R [x, d] is a simple Noetherian ring. KR Goodearl [4] has asked whether there has to be an element r of R such that d (r) is invertible. The aim of this note is to show that if K is a field of characteristic zero and n 5» 2 then the polynomial ring R=^[* ii X2,•••,* n] admits a K-derivation d such that R is d-simple and d (R) contains no units.The motivation behind Goodearl's question, apart from the observation that in all the best known examples of d-simple rings there occur invertible derivatives, is a feeling that the simple ring R [x, d] arising from a d-simple ring R with no invertible derivatives might possess significantly different properties from those of the known simple rings of differential polynomials. One distinction which can be drawn between such an example R [x, d] and, say, the Weyl algebra At (C) is that the former admits an outer derivation whereas it is known, see [3], p. 148, that the latter does not. Any ring R [x, d] of differential polynomials admits the derivation dldx of formal differentiation and this derivation is inner if and only if there exists reR such that d (r)= l. The derivation d of K [xlt x2,..., Xn] for which we show that K [xu* 2»•••>* n]^ d-simple is not the first such d to be constructed. J. Archer [1] has shown that, provided K is a field of characteristic zero, K [xu x2,..., XB] is 6-simple where