Were the mental health benefits of a housing mobility intervention larger for adolescents in higher socioeconomic status families?
Were the mental health benefits of a housing mobility intervention larger for adolescents in higher socioeconomic status families?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.05.002
复制
发表时间：
2013-09-01
期刊：
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Osypuk, Theresa L.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nguyen, Quynh C.;Schmidt, Nicole M.;Osypuk, Theresa L.
搬到机会（MTO）是一个社会实验，以测试如何搬迁到较低的贫困社区影响低收入家庭。使用4 - 7年评估的青少年数据（12-19岁，n=2829），我们应用性别分层的意向治疗和依从性调整的线性回归模型，以测试MTO干预对青少年心理健康影响的效果修改。父母教育程度低、领取福利金、失业和未婚状况不是显著的影响因素。根据这些特征定制移动干预措施可能不需要改变对青少年心理健康的影响。由于父母入学和青少年父母的地位对MTO干预对青少年心理健康的影响产生了不利影响，因此增加对青少年的指导和监督的移动后服务可能有助于支持移动后调整。(C)2013爱思唯尔有限公司保留所有权利。
Moving to Opportunity (MTO) was a social experiment to test how relocation to lower poverty neighborhoods influences low-income families. Using adolescent data from 4 to 7 year evaluations (aged 12-19, n=2829), we applied gender-stratified intent-to-treat and adherence-adjusted linear regression models, to test effect modification of MTO intervention effects on adolescent mental health. Low parental education, welfare receipt, unemployment and never-married status were not significant effect modifiers. Tailoring mobility interventions by these characteristics may not be necessary to alter impact on adolescent mental health. Because parental enrollment in school and teen parent status adversely modified MTO intervention effects on youth mental health, post-move services that increase guidance and supervision of adolescents may help support post-move adjustment. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.