Contraceptive Desert? Black-White Differences in Characteristics of Nearby Pharmacies
Contraceptive Desert? Black-White Differences in Characteristics of Nearby Pharmacies
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s40615-019-00570-3
复制
发表时间:
2019-08-01
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Farris, Karen
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Barber, Jennifer S.;Ela, Elizabeth;Farris, Karen
ObjectivesRace differences in contraceptive use and in geographic access to pharmacies are well established. We explore race differences in characteristics of nearby pharmacies that are likely to facilitate (or not) contraceptive purchase.Study DesignWe conducted analyses with two geocode-linked datasets: (1) the Relationship Dynamics and Social Life (RDSL) project, a study of a random sample of 1003 women ages 18-19 living in a county in Michigan in 2008-09; and (2) the Community Pharmacy Survey, which collected data on 82 pharmacies in the county in which the RDSL study was conducted.ResultsAlthough young African-American women tend to live closer to pharmacies than their white counterparts (1.2miles to the nearest pharmacy for African Americans vs. 2.1miles for whites), those pharmacies tend to be independent pharmacies (59vs. 16%) that are open fewer hours per week (64.6 vs. 77.8) and have fewer female pharmacists (17 vs. 50%), fewer patient brochures on contraception (2 vs. 5%), more difficult access to condoms (49% vs. 85% on the shelf instead ofbehind glass, behind the counter, or not available), and fewer self-check-out options (3 vs. 9%). More African-American than white women live near African-American pharmacists (8 vs. 3%). These race differences are regardless of poverty, measured by the receipt of public assistance.ConclusionsRelative to white women, African-American women may face a contraception desert, wherein they live nearer to pharmacies, but those pharmacies have characteristics that may impede the purchase of contraception.