Foucault, social movements and heterotopic horizons: rupturing the order of things
Foucault, social movements and heterotopic horizons: rupturing the order of things
复制标题
福柯、社会运动和异位视野：打破事物的秩序
DOI：
10.1080/14742837.2016.1252666
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Tom Campbell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Beckett;P. Bagguley;Tom Campbell
摘要 在本文中，我们探索和发展了米歇尔·福柯的异托邦概念在社会运动研究中的效用。根据福柯的理论，我们提出了社会运动异托邦的启发式类型学。考虑了五种异托邦“类型”：“包含”、“移动”、“云”、“相遇”和“根茎”。每个都有特定的属性，但都挑战正常的、常规的政治。从国家和资本的角度来看，它们要么处于“错误”的地点，以“错误”的方式前进，要么涉及“错误”的联系、密切关系或组织。这些是构造类型，是为了描述、比较和预测的目的而提出的。这些社会运动异托邦是促进抵抗和越轨实践的不同类型的空间。我们将福柯关于异托邦的写作置于其思想生涯的关键时刻，当时他越来越关注如何发明调节抵抗/权力创造力的特定机制、它们所塑造的身体类型以及它们使政治成为可能。我们提出了一种对异托邦的解释，将其与他后来关于权力、抵抗和自由的著作以及他的思想与吉尔·德勒兹的思想的相互作用联系起来。
Abstract In this article, we explore and develop the utility for social movement studies of Michel Foucault’s conceptualization of heterotopia. Informed by Foucault’s theorizing, we propose a heuristic typology of social movement heterotopias. Five heterotopia ‘types’ are considered: ‘contained’, ‘mobile’, ‘cloud’, ‘encounter’ and ‘rhizomic’. Each has particular attributes, but all challenge normal, routine politics. They do so by being, from the perspective of state and capital, either in the ‘wrong’ place, moving in the ‘wrong’ way, or involving the ‘wrong’ connections, affinities or organization. These are constructed-types, proposed for the purpose of description, comparison and prediction. These social movement heterotopias are different types of space that facilitate practices of resistance and transgression. We situate Foucault’s writing on heterotopia at a pivotal moment in his intellectual career, when he became increasingly concerned with how particular mechanisms for modulating the creative force of resistance/power are invented, the types of bodies they craft and the politics they make possible. We propose an interpretation of heterotopia that relates it to his later work on power, resistance and freedom, and the interplay of his ideas with those of Gilles Deleuze.