Harp Collaboration
Harp Collaboration
复制标题
竖琴合作
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Spain
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Catanesi;M. Muciaccia;E. Radicioni;S. Simone;R. Edgecock;M. Ellis;S. Robbins;F. Soler;C. Gössling;M. Maß;S. Bunyatov;A. Chukanov;D. Dedovitch;A. Elagin;M. Gostkin;A. Guskov;D. Khartchenko;O. Klimov;A. Krasnoperov;D. Kustov;K. Nikolaev;B. Popov;V. Serdiouk;V. Tereshchenko;A. Zhemchugov;E. Capua;G. Vidal;Sitjes;Cern;Switzerland A Geneva;S. Blondel;M. Borghi;A. Campanelli;Cervera;M. C. Villanueva;G. Morone;Prior;R. Schroeter;V. Ableev;U. Gastaldi;G. Mills;J. Graulich;G. Grégoire;M. Bonesini;M. Calvi;A. De Min;F. Ferri;M. Paganoni;F. Paleari;M. Kirsanov;A. Bagulya;V. Grichine;N. Polukhina;P. N. Lebedev;V. Palladino;G. Barr;A. De Santo;C. Pattison;K. Zuber;F. Bobisut;D. Gibin;A. Guglielmi;M. Laveder;A. Menegolli;M. Mezzetto;J. Dumarchez;S. Troquereau;F. Vannucci;V. Ammosov;V. Gapienko;V. Koreshev;A. Semak;Y. Sviridov;V. Zaets;D. Orestano;M. Pasquali;F. Pastore;A. Tonazzo;L. Tortora;C. Booth;C. Buttar;P. Hodgson;L. Howlett;M. Bogomilov;M. Chizhov;D. Kolev;R. Tsenov;S. Piperov;P. Temnikov;M. Apollonio;P. Chimenti;G. Giannini;G. Santin;J. Burguet;Castell;J. J. Gómez;Cadenas;P. Novella;M. Sorel;A. Tornero;De Valencia;Spain
A precision measurement of the double-differential production cross-section, d 2 σ π + /dpdΩ, for pions of positive charge, performed in the HARP experiment is presented. The incident particles are protons of 12.9 GeV/c momentum impinging on an aluminium target of 5% nuclear interaction length. The measurement of this cross-section has a direct application to the calculation of the neutrino flux of the K2K experiment. After cuts, 210 000 secondary tracks reconstructed in the forward spectrometer were used in this analysis. The results are given for secondaries within a momentum range from 0.75 GeV/c to 6.5 GeV/c, and within an angular range from 30 mrad to 210 mrad. The absolute normalization was performed using prescaled beam triggers counting protons on target. The overall scale of the cross-section is known to better than 6%, while the average point-to-point error is 8.2%.