Choice of Therapeutic Approaches as a Function of Sex of Subject, Type of Problem, and Sex and Title of Helper
Choice of Therapeutic Approaches as a Function of Sex of Subject, Type of Problem, and Sex and Title of Helper
复制标题
根据受试者性别、问题类型以及帮助者的性别和头衔来选择治疗方法
DOI：
10.1080/03069889200760201
复制
发表时间：
1992
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Cook
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Dancey;W. Dryden;C. Cook
摘要 一项研究对 96 名受试者进行了研究，以发现他们对四种治疗方法的偏好如何随性别、他们被要求想象的问题类型（亲密或工作/学术）以及他们寻求帮助的专业人士的性别和头衔（咨询师或心理治疗师）而变化。使用的四种方法是：精神分析疗法、认知行为疗法、人本主义疗法以及由非专业帮助者（例如朋友和亲戚）通常给出的反应组成的“常识”方法。结果表明，总体而言，认知行为方法更受青睐，紧随其后的是人文方法；常识性方法和精神分析疗法的评分最低。然而，互动表明情况比这更复杂：女性更喜欢女性帮手，男性没有特别的偏好；受试者首选的方法类型在某种程度上取决于问题的类型......
Abstract A study was carried out using 96 subjects to discover how their preferences for four therapeutic approaches varied as a function of their sex, the type of problem they were asked to imagine they had (intimate or work/academic), and sex and title (counsellor or psychotherapist) of the professional from whom they would seek help. The four approaches used were: psychoanalytic therapy, cognitive-behavioural therapy, humanistic therapy, and a ‘common-sense’ approach consisting of responses typically given by non-professional helpers (e.g. friends and relatives). The results showed that the cognitive-behavioural approach was preferred overall, closely followed by the humanistic approach; the common-sense approach and psychoanalytic therapy were given the lowest ratings. However, interactions showed the picture to be more complex than this: women preferred female helpers, with men having no particular preferences; and the type of approach subjects preferred depended to some extent on the type of problem...