Compulsive sexual behavior inventory: A preliminary study of reliability and validity

Compulsive sexual behavior inventory: A preliminary study of reliability and validity
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/009262301317081070
复制
发表时间:
2001-07-01
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Raymond, N
Raymond, N
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Coleman, E;Miner, M;Raymond, N

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这项初步研究旨在根据经验制定强迫性行为(CSB)量表,并在非性欲倒错 CSB 个体样本(N = 15)、接受性犯罪治疗的恋童癖样本(N = 35)以及正常对照样本(N = 42)中测试其可靠性和有效性。经过因子分析和最大方差旋转后,旋转因子上的因子负载大于 0.60 的项目将被保留。确定了三个因素,似乎可以衡量控制、虐待和暴力。 Cronbach's alpha 表明该分量表具有良好的信度。然后通过线性判别函数分析测试 28 项量表的有效性。该量表成功区分了非恋童癖 CSB 样本和恋童癖者与对照组。进一步分析表明,该量表是 CSB 的有效衡量标准,因为三组之间在对照分量表上存在显着差异。恋童癖者在虐待分量表上的得分显着低于其他两组,而其他两组的得分彼此之间没有显着差异。这表明恋童癖者比非恋童癖 CSB 个体或对照组更容易施虐。恋童癖者在暴力分量表上的得分明显低于对照组。有强迫行为的非性欲倒错者在暴力分量表上的得分略低,但差异并不显着。作为一项初步研究,本研究存在一些局限性,应在更大样本量的进一步研究中解决。
This preliminary study was designed to develop empirically a scale of compulsive sexual behavior (CSB) and to test its reliability and validity in a sample of individuals with nonparaphilic CSB (N = 15), in a sample of pedophiles (N = 35) in treatment for sexual offending, and in a sample of normal controls (N = 42). Following a factor analysis and a varimax rotation, those items with factor loadings on the rotated factors of greater than .60 were retained. Three factors were identified, which appeared to measure control, abuse and violence. Cronbach's alphas indicated that the subscales have good reliability. The 28-item scale was then tested for validity by a linear discriminant function analysis. The scale successfully discriminated the nonparaphilic CSB sample and the pedophiles from controls. Further analysis indicated that this scale is a valid measure of CSB in that there were significant differences between the three groups on the control subscale. Pedophiles scored significantly lower than the other two groups on the abuse subscale, with the other two groups not scoring significantly differently form one another. This indicated that pedophiles were more abusive than nonparaphilic CSB individuals or the controls. Pedophiles scored significantly lower than the controls on the violence subscale. Nonparaphilic individuals with compulsive behavior scored slightly lower on the violence subscale, although not significantly different. As a preliminary study, there were several limitations to this study, which should be addressed in further studies with larger sample sizes.